Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 04 June 2012 08:09 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC16421F877E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 01:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YEFSqA7GShPf for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 01:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A462921F8575 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 01:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jun 2012 08:08:59 -0000
Received: from p5DD95FED.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [93.217.95.237] by mail.gmx.net (mp040) with SMTP; 04 Jun 2012 10:08:59 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/ctKUS9h/c+D4qo8bQmJVG8w47Iw/GjZG0gKwONq HPsDenwzc5WxyF
Message-ID: <4FCC6D13.9020106@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:08:51 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <7B9B7D15-9510-4C90-9B77-EEC55262758C@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <7B9B7D15-9510-4C90-9B77-EEC55262758C@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Mike Kelly <mike@stateless.co>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:09:01 -0000
On 2012-06-01 03:08, Mark Nottingham wrote: > We've published an -02 draft of LCI: > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-linked-cache-inv-02> > > and intend to request publication as an Individual Submission Informational RFC soon (the link relations have just been submitted for review). Feedback still welcome (http list is best, I think). Here's another question: the proposal defines both a cache directive and link relations. Have you considered putting all the link-related information into a cache directive as well? (Not saying it should be the case but wondering whether that would keep things together that belong together). Best regards, Julian
- [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02 Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02 Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02 Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02 Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02 Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02 Poul-Henning Kamp