Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 16 February 2014 03:56 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CE41A033C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 19:56:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.043
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.043 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Smkg712XpVSM for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 19:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61ABA1A033B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 19:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 12123 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2014 03:56:04 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 16 Feb 2014 03:56:04 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=530036d3.xn--i8sz2z.k1402; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=ZiHz+Qe036gUUDzbBRm9fV09x4NZ0IzqNs0Gkl06iRI=; b=LiDVbatAFEqblw/VzLGScq/zLvHqf87Qpj7lepRoxAj4zH83E4h2WlsFN61hPdwMimBn1xR/YqNK7yJMo68q2kY+DFaMYLgxRYY/wha3WAyDYIQ0XWVlvxoLD8TfUvMRDnSS8wj5FUYDhEAdQuX5SkExZhqLXAeLJ9cqGpncYx1vAcADLGUWNMxzpeLbAAz81jDvC3NDGgfcTo1nhS4Nxffmh8QTgYC/9T0ayGMdeGjSolqcFtRAm0xA72NkV78Q
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=530036d3.xn--i8sz2z.k1402; bh=ZiHz+Qe036gUUDzbBRm9fV09x4NZ0IzqNs0Gkl06iRI=; b=R2/VU+wtU10lqgOfvjEs41T5e/7ezPkuQmhhs3L52tmQbvR3wofRqQiU+09tokzOdl17kF1ti7233wLgWtE4uM70LasM9LVRLtnbg6Ngc5MMAOrDuFZocMJBlm3WKQA6Ec51Oqpw/IaJbfR6Hzd8kGHPVdSPHQoRVtWO0nBIAg4XPsQ9iUmBx6cYVAz3iBWClbhmtdlx3BHZf+mxOfGRzdk1Uy+FvSy1YB1Ku20TxAzp3s9D1t852tkeweOiMN2o
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:55:39 -0000
Message-ID: <20140216035539.2686.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAKioOqv8kq_FwoFEMLMejqKAAo=_hFZiE4B9K4RscEBVcU_vrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/5Jk72NMpcTzqdfmwVGInl9svnL4
Cc: darrel@tavis.ca
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:56:09 -0000
>One of the major advantages of using URI templates, beyond freeing the >server from conforming to conventions, is that it makes client code >really simple. People keep saying this. My client is a three line shell script that uses wget and grep (really.) Could you explain how that works with templates? While you're at it, it'd also be helpful to identify some web servers that people might plausibly use to implement RDAP in 2014 (as opposed to an exercise in retrocomputing) that couldn't handle the syntax in rdap-query. You can skip the .wellknown stuff, which is a holdover from a point when we thought we might use something like SRV records that don't provide a path in the bootstrap. R's, John
- Re: [apps-discuss] unpersuasive advice, was draft… John Levine
- [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Erik Wilde
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Andrew Newton
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Andrew Newton
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Simon Perreault
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Andrew Newton
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Darrel Miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Darrel Miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Andrew Newton
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Darrel Miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Darrel Miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Andrew Newton
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] unpersuasive advice, was draft… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Graham Klyne
- [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up to yo… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up t… Andrew Newton
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up t… Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up t… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up t… Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up t… Paul Hoffman