IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] +exi

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sun, 18 December 2011 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A69521F8A4B for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:11:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fUqgfqHTrSN4 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:11:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2A721F8A4E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:11:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eekc14 with SMTP id c14so3009426eek.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:11:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KmmyEybsMoJ0mRPYbeVENs9wRQPmebl2nkE3Ff9e1dI=; b=gm4b0d/Mk/Ndr7WVgCC5aHLxjAaD1s2SbU/Jw37f7Rbt6CJ7BvVlkBu772kSr6miLb 5WcjENqmA9g5HGrwt1y+YGjyM+z45O68ONT3lZtXV7jSR2v7DlULMirC1x4ieDT5t7dH GyXTsmH7j/IVR5KhEKkyui9meZ816bveUe4iU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.132.79 with SMTP id a15mr338714bkt.109.1324177900778; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:11:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.79.74 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:11:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3AC08E67-21D3-471D-8CE8-45B9FAB8A74F@sensinode.com>
References: <4EC31F1E.6070304@stpeter.im> <8p86c7d6chvadsku6k5dhct20qkl7uk73l@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <4EC326FE.1010809@stpeter.im> <lu96c7hsl37325nn3184ub4vr88qjgja50@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <EDB50792-348B-4693-9FDF-04BA091F8BE9@sensinode.com> <4EE78F2F.2070601@stpeter.im> <20111213215816.GI5525@jay.w3.org> <5EFF390A-3D29-4F15-95BE-C81EFCF6D3D5@mnot.net> <20111214092327.GK5525@jay.w3.org> <7472087B-86F9-4683-BA74-F70EC98D483C@sensinode.com> <20111217104103.GP5525@jay.w3.org> <3AC08E67-21D3-471D-8CE8-45B9FAB8A74F@sensinode.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 14:11:40 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXHAwMGMDNdK=sN25+Yds8M5hfA4=4q=ZkTdS6H082e3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Zach Shelby <zach@sensinode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: paduffy@cisco.com, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Thomas Herbst <therbst@silverspringnet.com>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] +exi
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 03:11:45 -0000

On 18 December 2011 06:34, Zach Shelby <zach@sensinode.com> wrote:
> I don't find the SchemaId all that useful. First of all, you need to invoke your EXI parser to even get at that. It is more useful to immediately look at the content-type to decide which parser to throw a representation at. A strictly defined foo+exi registration would tell you that nicely.

ISTM that a link relation type for schema would make some sort of
difference.  The JSON schema draft had a "describedby" relation type
that might fit the bill (though "schema" is shorter).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email