Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 18 April 2016 07:01 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4E312D8E7; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OuinYDTUz7tT; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 157A412D998; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id e185so209690077vkb.1; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=/hJ+x8XeKZELk5RrKyAFaQRaIbwTZSDhN6/cX2qlZgU=; b=0HA9nsxxKND0yEBZF2M3ewSqXGKXmllmzQ06COnPPxikhuGncfgyurLULgS1eXiWrR esoq4DChHjIjBxq5HOfPElMFok8zFXSVOZahP5H6xBlTLPzZ/uWhI+6mIYndgyFF6vAh 5ce381d9aJnPI60IkjWRIDir0aIhmqkULQwdWCWUP9cH0Q6HtNWvXjPcxFEup7B8HLBW XAu99jUDZI29RubeDJdg7OE5LzRNVBp+xvYOk7+v/nzekJ1fSXTjmxChJakahs78bW8e +oN/VVJe9lKsg3WysKhygJ6xwwoLPKZUwx99K/THa9XUUgrTYrY7xwDX3/D9hhyMZ8NN 2q7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=/hJ+x8XeKZELk5RrKyAFaQRaIbwTZSDhN6/cX2qlZgU=; b=k3hO018waXxqsCYGMWKzWy6m/h4BDb04dKX1CkwDPDxhr1FQBkDvGU+EHGlt13JM3O ii6dZZowXxjclsCzzohctFGLR3Rjisfb/TstdYNQN2rCAmf9p6bJc+bWyj9K/FaZ92uv RTSWTMSbzk5MeCxIcXgzMK0UK5SyXNMDBcxFkDStin99iB2nQ9/+4SbN6DNgQIIJdpM8 Y+GlaD8FRXEcgpspFr+YIEHYInyqTvc1appdOcjofHvr/hUyZiK/mpuAD9PJE35jw3s8 CV9/XXB4+/0YDW3Z3ji0+hznrHLi0EVH4Sm2DBK3GbA5f+psFmT5We5cHRmHp1ZPvhBZ DQ7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FV7RNAvGIQV75v++MDKzSgs5ph57p4yhk26r1pTxpWYWk0k0aEsTGJQu/pZ2gOg1DUsut1ZaemBMr7sPw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.176.1.54 with SMTP id 51mr17412266uak.123.1460962859161; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.43.5 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <570D4C99.1030405@dcrocker.net>
References: <570D4C99.1030405@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaXdyJwRczZFVkkqUENGnr_uwMNUfhi3P4gznbUvYxi-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113c86a8401fb30530bcec09
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/638GcI8UcKBoKxsLrm3nNj72HGE>
Cc: art-ads@ietf.org, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 07:01:01 -0000

On a purely procedural note:

Given the renewed activity here and the interest in making changes, I
presume this will be reworked enough now to warrant an eventual second
Working Group Last Call.  Unless there's objection to doing so, I'll move
the document back to that state.

-MSK