Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful-01.txt

Royer Software and Services <royersoftwareandservices@gmail.com> Wed, 03 November 2010 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <royersoftwareandservices@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848743A6AC9 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.27 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.329, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y6EBd14t1+91 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D243A6AC5 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so836164iwn.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oUfg4xsTCCNLbdSoTjYC0Y0EIBPvUYuDEIZ5C2ua2WU=; b=IzcwhHCwrHFZgiuo38/IK9EEXFXSyq/HqfbcUYB94S9z1q7ymF43YC5aq5B0TJZpmg aFExdp1xGb//QAxKTjk29ra544wPsBEDuT/XgdEn2uUc2qRLD7Qix2TunGlTN6gPTXrf iKSzzKvKfTZqsIhHDmipFnKIaRSSPo/5+ja6Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=iKQuLhwxwsVNKaDHOZJtf3hx+IPwN9/lTGR+MNt0/xtzPlO3TPP9Jkoghuh+Ej2DXI vqr78Pfkc3TUg/710M6pRS0ETYJL0nFUMYqDy1XnamVveqE4EhjfGNpSpT5hOF57o5GA 10ZJ9YR7kFXI4zZWo2kOgvi2DefGSKG8iIe6c=
Received: by 10.231.39.205 with SMTP id h13mr4239923ibe.148.1288796213246; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.58] ([63.227.129.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fw4sm939620ibb.7.2010.11.03.07.56.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4CD17826.40002@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 08:56:38 -0600
From: Royer Software and Services <royersoftwareandservices@gmail.com>
Organization: http://Project-Contracting.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <4CBDE23C.7050904@stpeter.im> <33432E57-C1EF-4258-A2F9-7CBD730C302D@Isode.COM> <4CD0E09C.40303@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4CD0E09C.40303@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:56:47 -0000

Stop producing 'X-' == good idea.

There was an annoyingly long X- debate on calsch years ago.

The problem there was vendors hijacking the protocol with tons of their 
vendor specific extensions such
that it was difficult to have real interoperability.

Another problem was when vendors used their extensions to alter the flow 
or meaning of the data. With their
application it works just fine, with their competitors, it would 
sometimes work depending on the rest of the data.
So calsch said that those not approved by the working group, are 
considered experimental and must start
with X- .

A registration process with some additional instructions would have 
solved the problem. I can see in the future
it would be written as, those extensions not approved by the working 
groups must be registered vendor specific
and must not alter the flow or meaning of the data.

--

Doug - Royer Software and Services
http://Project-Contracting.com
(208) 806-1358 / (714) 989-6135