[apps-discuss] APPSDIR Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-10

Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp> Tue, 09 April 2013 04:30 UTC

Return-Path: <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5209521F9020; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wky5MolMg-Q6; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from off-send01.tyo.jprs.co.jp (off-send01.tyo.jprs.co.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:8:17::10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D1C21F8FC7; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from off-sendsmg01.tyo.jprs.co.jp (off-sendsmg01.tyo.jprs.co.jp [172.18.8.32]) by off-send01.tyo.jprs.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r394Twtd018484; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:29:58 +0900
X-AuditID: ac120820-b7fec6d000005acc-4a-51639945388a
Received: from NOTE338 (off-cpu04.tyo.jprs.co.jp [172.18.4.14]) by off-sendsmg01.tyo.jprs.co.jp (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 38.FE.23244.54993615; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:29:58 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:29:55 +0900
From: Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal.all@tools.ietf.org
Message-Id: <20130409132955.15d4bb2cadcc8261658723c8@jprs.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrGIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWyRoiFT9dtZnKgwaFTHBarX65gs/jw7jar xYw/E5ktuto2sziweCxZ8pPJ4+/9d6weXy5/ZgtgjuKySUnNySxLLdK3S+DKOHyEv2AtR0XX onWsDYz32boYOTgkBEwkHv7I7WLkBDLFJC7cW88GYgsJHGeU+NCjDmKzCKhIbNnfzwJiswkY SPxa9psJxBYRCJF4cP8LK4jNLCAo0fT+FViNsICTxJfOV4wgNq+Ag8TnS+cYIeZbSFxo6mAH WcsLVP93hzCIySygLrF+nhDEFHmJ5q2zmScw8s5CKJqFUDQLSdECRuZVjDL5aWm6xal5KcW5 6QaGeiWV+XpZBUXFeskgehMjONg4FHYwzjhlcIhRgINRiYe37lFSoBBrYllxZe4hRkkOJiVR 3hfTkwOF+JLyUyozEosz4otKc1KLDzFKcDArifB2GwLleFMSK6tSi/JhUtIcLErivMfP7vAT EkhPLEnNTk0tSC2CycpwcChJ8O4FGSpYlJqeWpGWmVOCkGbi4AQZzgM0/AlIDW9xQWJucWY6 RP4Uo6SUOO9LkIQASCKjNA+u9xWjONALwryHQLI8wMQB1/UKaCAT0ED+C/EgA0sSEVJSDYxC VtybjKfs8PiiGfTt8Iytbxis5eO6xa/9K1NkPK23796MI0cVAmVOMHJEbdHoXKpzMPvHKaYw Z4Ps0h+/7k9ZUc6R2z1BPbki8FjO0dcdXz6ZH4/r91j8OfL65cB9QsYTks07q1QND5iyJ5vy V2dpHdq22eHxbG7OZ7Z+Hnddaq84GnJ8s1FiKc5INNRiLipOBACocks62QIAAA==
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-10
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:30:07 -0000

I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for 
this draft (for background on appsdir, please see 
​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate ).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd 
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-10
Title: Signaling Cryptographic Algorithm Understanding in DNSSEC
Reviewer: Yoshiro Yoneya
Review Date: 2013-04-09
IETF Last Call Date: 2013-03-20
IESG Telechat Date: not known

Summary: 

  This draft is almost ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC.

Major Issues: 

  none

Minor Issues: 

- Section 2 [Page 4]
  LIST-LENGTH is an integer which can be zero.  Using zero for LIST-LENGTH 
  is meaningless and it must be avoided not to be waste of resources.
  LIST-LENGTH should be specified as one or more explicitly.

Regards,

-- 
Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>