Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail BCP

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Wed, 10 August 2011 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6430221F8B58 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.497, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vWEjFACIm+sM for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F234C21F8B57 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:55:55 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:55:55 -0700
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail BCP
Thread-Index: AcxXp0sWwMS2/gYjTCqcpdN7xXHH4QAAN74g
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF6B2@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF694@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110810143624.0a2c2b78@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110810143624.0a2c2b78@resistor.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail BCP
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:55:24 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SM [mailto:sm@resistor.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 2:48 PM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail BCP
> 
> IANA makes unique assignments and maintains registries for the
> currently assigned values.  A malformation does not require such an
> assignment.

On the contrary, it seems IANA was willing to create this kind of registry for us.

I suppose you could think of it as advice (values) assigned to malformations (keys).