IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question

William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com> Wed, 23 May 2012 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFD821F8790 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 11:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.122
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.122 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.476, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qEP2Cn2Ahcdy for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 11:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm13.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm13.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E9D6921F8789 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 May 2012 11:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.91.69] by nm13.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 May 2012 18:37:26 -0000
Received: from [98.139.91.47] by tm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 May 2012 18:37:26 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1047.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 May 2012 18:37:26 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 566733.33390.bm@omp1047.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 99239 invoked by uid 60001); 23 May 2012 18:37:25 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=ginc1024; t=1337798245; bh=kPVYOxKFUV1WIOonPC3dE+8Fy/CQczjcsdX6xeRYXwU=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NmEUSTmraf7VZAgYjDAcrj2G24Cz4hGL3Gb67Z238tJjbhC5vHRDOy/1aHulaU9KQWH7hWZO/nyPec4dTklkLfTjhPO2G3WtWasEZGXtBzU24EqF80MxPd0QbBeJC+uFsTtfk1/6dKsGZlkRt69F3AxpWdOtwkjTuOmng1FSppM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ginc1024; d=yahoo-inc.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Lb/vFx6HlZecH7kJg47QVr+nYDht1tt+0TiByobTgjUl/SliFqbd6WkX9MBv2pIz7s2W2r8pWrixyraLLO1daO3sj20I8TeAL221GoUVUO2sz8aCYIpzgu40ZmB+o53csNyJJ4H3PZydtwHH2y/8lc1TAKmQgct/OUNfRMhj78w=;
X-YMail-OSG: CWYuPvUVM1lf9MwgtK3bxAi7Sk9Mua0ZIEHMNrFrDUZxESf vbV9IUrQ7hPIH5XDMZKt78Rqz8c.nOUHauC2X559yVFO8v4XVjUe2Lcel7Oy HTJ72oHZtTQ7fzLxGNDhof5ov9ryd3TSPu33RKBFpbLdxmaynVSD7Enl6wu6 Dev9A59zQylAXDEJ2Wkm2ZoU1BfMQDIK4ojxx1vdPHuhq9k23fWX551yKN_t cqg7vvJtam793EjtOI7TOPL9uYWXaWPxCYCvP472hSO0LzcDUWA7q5F.dR5y cdZQ3zgqywkxV.S.sdpACAjFLnBg9xntqTvGelbsyA3YKPlLhB.Br_tHNwY. KSck3X4pwbxkRKq3Blk16CHVpXCT8YyKx9CQFM7EQhsGJn9fp1j2pcvLE8Pd j2a_LZfC.ZcqCSHhJdkM.7oAazt.C42dEE8ZTB86HNNDAc6Tc7.6y
Received: from [209.131.62.115] by web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 23 May 2012 11:37:25 PDT
X-RocketYMMF: william_john_mills
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.118.349524
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392812B6B6@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943665131A7@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <7BCF42BF-127F-478B-A922-1E84D087A0F3@ve7jtb.com> <4FBBE0A6.5040906@stpeter.im> <B3B7CC14-B6E2-40FC-BA84-427CEE96A8E5@ve7jtb.com> <1337714535.85430.YahooMailNeo@web31806.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4FBBEF0C.1020108@stpeter.im> <45370D62-B0A0-43F3-831F-BCAFA3959F8F@ve7jtb.com> <CAKaEYhJEWChPS4MS8pa+trqSNsmDS=dbD0gjK4Lu84a_=Lgbiw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1337798245.55153.YahooMailNeo@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:37:25 -0700
From: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKaEYhJEWChPS4MS8pa+trqSNsmDS=dbD0gjK4Lu84a_=Lgbiw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1935884094-1216070097-1337798245=:55153"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 18:37:28 -0000

I would argue that discovery for mailto: is covered by MX records in DNS, no?




>________________________________
> From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> 
>Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org> 
>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:03 AM
>Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question
> 
>
>
>
>
>On 22 May 2012 22:35, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> wrote:
>
>While minimizing work is valuable.  Minimizing risk is also.
>>
>>WF should work with any URI.
>>
>
>While I dont mind whether WF works with any URI or not.  It should be noted:
>
>http already has discovery (follow your nose)
>
>xmpp i believe already has discovery
>
>mailto: is the gap that it would be good to close
>
>were there any alternate schemes that there is a use case for, other than the 3 above?
> 
>
>>It should not be dependant on acct:
>>
>
>+1
> 
>
>
>>acct: will undergo more scrutiny than WF to get approved as a scheme.
>>
>
>+1
> 
>
>
>>John B.
>>
>>
>>
>>On 2012-05-22, at 3:54 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/22/12 1:22 PM, William Mills wrote:
>>>> I say leave acct: in the current spec.  While I don't think it's
>>>> strictly necessary for the purposes of WF I don't think it's a
>>>> significant flaw either.  I also think breaking it out into a separate
>>>> spec at this point is just extra work.
>>>
>>> Probably, yes. Minimizing the work is valuable.
>>>
>>> /psa
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>apps-discuss mailing list
>>apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>apps-discuss mailing list
>apps-discuss@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>
>
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status