Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 11 February 2014 22:33 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637EF1A07B1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:33:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZsPeksWFbMqS for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873491A07A4 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 60013 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 22:33:13 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 11 Feb 2014 22:33:13 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=52faa529.xn--i8sz2z.k1402; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=1yMZBZvHYsPjjtM6TKuyDDRzNbIBAE+dKvGK8w1VKFg=; b=olPNXxePOC97dde7epL6Oo8brLS9K8MS99j1aLCBkun2Ri4sSXlRJkNwBWK3qDvrZsq9G7YtLAfNQ1qr22YlYcXvMVIY8B3RxErn6pZ/TQN2gnY4XG9NKuR70USHqMYQdPoujLoV/yIQ/B1595Sf93YhC4CC9+9+xxlSCKb1i/DYgFuU1clemKHf2d73P/PJWZTS/x9j7Mq3MjbF6NeljJVR1KnD6BfPXtlqow2EKVovvxFZqhllVO/T3OmXBOpP
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=52faa529.xn--i8sz2z.k1402; bh=1yMZBZvHYsPjjtM6TKuyDDRzNbIBAE+dKvGK8w1VKFg=; b=OJUeuY8Fa5Oxomp4emKhCX0FnngXZxMccaZjq2W7dFHbnCLdfSzgmJOMs5/J2o8ZWlJP5EAaaDfkfx+2sYmH11qdp0itb5/+8RD5ci0BciNIS2kSwdSd+Edl6EzSRQ0go5YAih7nBNDZw4gIkv5cwTIUc6OqyhR4s59hcs6MmywM7/V6pwmrheHUbGl1JTtWWMwYIAIVYaeHK3fhO8aWfybF8n9lp7fqYukKFbzYGkjMskFLpTYcgd324uPxNAFr
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:32:50 -0000
Message-ID: <20140211223250.68983.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <40E62D1E-983E-465A-A169-2104BCFA587B@mnot.net>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:33:16 -0000
>domain: example.com > rel: domainlookup href-template: http://example.com/lookup/{domain} > >I'm very curious to hear what other APPS folks think about this RDAP is a new design. There are no existing RDAP servers other than a few prototypes run by people on the WEIRDS list. There's nothing to be backward compatible with. RDAP is intended as a replacement for WHOIS, to answer the same questions that people ask now using WHOIS, e.g. information about domain names, IP addresses, ASNs, and a few other things. The questions that people ask with WHOIS haven't changed materially in 20 years, and I see no reason to expect them to change in the future. Small RDAP servers will likely adapt the RDAP prototype being funded by ICANN. Large RDAP servers will be written by a handful of large registries, all of which are represented on the WEIRDS list and can speak for themselves, but I can't remember any of them showing notable enthusiasm for templates. In this particular application, I really can't see any benefit to templates other than the ability to be gratuitously different just to prove that you can. R's, John
- Re: [apps-discuss] unpersuasive advice, was draft… John Levine
- [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Erik Wilde
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Andrew Newton
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Andrew Newton
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Simon Perreault
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Andrew Newton
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Darrel Miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Darrel Miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Andrew Newton
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Darrel Miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Darrel Miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Andrew Newton
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] unpersuasive advice, was draft… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00… Graham Klyne
- [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up to yo… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up t… Andrew Newton
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up t… Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up t… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up t… Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up t… Paul Hoffman