IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-04.txt

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 08 July 2011 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB1721F8C44 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 10:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.766
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.766 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ALCY7bVKLDrx for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 10:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F60421F8BF3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 10:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1QfF8L-000JHf-24; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:46:33 -0400
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:46:32 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <C3E9EF6E0154D73656D30639@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <CAHhFybq563a9+ivYuk83J3po_02nopeiu=mB3fO26f-o1Mwt0A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4E15C895.6020701@gmail.com> <CAHhFybq563a9+ivYuk83J3po_02nopeiu=mB3fO26f-o1Mwt0A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>, Apps-discuss list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-04.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:46:39 -0000

--On Friday, July 08, 2011 19:37 +0200 Frank Ellermann
<hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7 July 2011 16:54, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> 
>>> draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-04.txt
>...
> The anonymous:mail construct is also not more state of the art
> for privacy reasons, unless it is a mail address in TLD invalid
> or similar.

Disagree.  If I'm an FTP repository provider, I can ask you to
give up your email address in return for service if I want to.
Whether I trust the address you give me is another matter, but
that isn't a privacy issue.

>...

I've already expressed my concerns about a number of other
components of this scheme.

    john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email