[apps-discuss] Apps-Review Team Review: draft-ietf-enum-iax-10
Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info> Tue, 19 April 2011 04:08 UTC
Return-Path: <jyee@afilias.info>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6501E06AA for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nijh0YzE+BME for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.afilias.info (outbound.afilias.info [69.46.124.26]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF6FE0611 for <Apps-Discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ms5.yyz2.afilias-ops.info ([10.50.129.111] helo=smtp.afilias.info) by outbound.afilias.info with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1QC2Et-0000Ph-5j for Apps-Discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 04:08:35 +0000
Received: from mail-iw0-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]) by smtp.afilias.info with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1QC2Et-0001QZ-51 for Apps-Discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 04:08:35 +0000
Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so23544337iwn.9 for <Apps-Discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.115.67 with SMTP id j3mr1809728icq.302.1303186115148; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (69-196-161-240.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.161.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y10sm3108186iba.46.2011.04.18.21.08.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
From: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:08:31 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E3A6FACA-4A62-499F-8264-DC2A5C585716@afilias.info>
To: Apps-Discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: klaus.darilion@nic.at, edguy@CleverSpoke.com
Subject: [apps-discuss] Apps-Review Team Review: draft-ietf-enum-iax-10
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 04:08:36 -0000
(Resend with different mail address, sorry for duplication) Greeting, I have been selected as the Applications Area Review Team reviewer for this draft (for background on apps-review, please see http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/applications-area-review-team). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-enum-iax-10 Title: IANA Registration for Enumservice 'iax' Reviewer: Joseph Yee Review Date: April 18, 2011 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC but has a few nits that should be fixed before publication. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: None Nits: (1) In Section 5, IANA Considerations, words suggested to make registration type more specific Original This document requests registration of the 'iax' Enumservice according.... Suggestion This document requests registration of the Enumservice Type 'iax' according..... (2) In Section 5, IANA Considerations, specifications reference should include RFC6116 Original according to the guidelines and specifications in [RFC6117] and the definitions in Section 2 in this document. Suggestion according to the guidelines and specifications in [RFC6117], [RFC6116] and the definitions in Section 2 in this document. Best Regards, Joseph Yee
- [apps-discuss] Apps-Review Team Review: draft-iet… Joseph Yee
- Re: [apps-discuss] Apps-Review Team Review: draft… Bernie Hoeneisen
- [apps-discuss] Apps-Review Team Review: draft-iet… Joseph Yee
- Re: [apps-discuss] Apps-Review Team Review: draft… Joseph Yee