Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question

Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org> Fri, 25 May 2012 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <michiel@unhosted.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AD521F85EA for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57GPqHRcEu3B for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006A521F85D5 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dacx6 with SMTP id x6so1177860dac.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=7vw+IymXFuzQrXmMcgG5Nz94I5wN4OOfk9k7ziq1Sig=; b=f58221PpztIEsSvMAyXrb77afw3EA5SPnvz6yshYB4XYWG2/qy5JKQuro3P934Ml29 nOWaTdI9d3jjWkKMQF2AFqtT0SJK+0twimnpSoSn6YEul8n33hCt6/GWix6vasir9TSE LQMk2jLgR5rDzMoJff6FWKmZUIs0v00v1T3eRbpFcfIVYyMREW425zIoAWwKAHUKVxMF YK+6As39/eeCq7JXjSMD52yoEYpz/gEgJO85neJSF23i2Pw498n3LuB7RhJr+V3c5Bjl LtyZB98tLd2eHv3j2XC9dP2e5xJg9qhOL5mznGuWmyb/jk7berJeKFh/Zenge52ncPGH DN4g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.239.161 with SMTP id vt1mr8415717pbc.15.1337946360733; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.57.102 with HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [178.0.223.216]
In-Reply-To: <03142CEC-FE2D-4232-BFE4-AB5E02880AC1@ve7jtb.com>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392812B6B6@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943665131A7@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <7BCF42BF-127F-478B-A922-1E84D087A0F3@ve7jtb.com> <4FBBE0A6.5040906@stpeter.im> <B3B7CC14-B6E2-40FC-BA84-427CEE96A8E5@ve7jtb.com> <1337714535.85430.YahooMailNeo@web31806.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4FBBEF0C.1020108@stpeter.im> <45370D62-B0A0-43F3-831F-BCAFA3959F8F@ve7jtb.com> <CAKaEYhJEWChPS4MS8pa+trqSNsmDS=dbD0gjK4Lu84a_=Lgbiw@mail.gmail.com> <1337798245.55153.YahooMailNeo@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <04f601cd3957$14ea4d90$3ebee8b0$@packetizer.com> <f5b396pzwkg.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <058101cd39b6$02a28990$07e79cb0$@packetizer.com> <811BB5B1-74BB-4754-B064-DD198FCCADB6@ve7jtb.com> <CA+aD3u1uuNq2Wu6kdPgTU2DTNQhjbMfOEMiajkEBmrBOKR8G0w@mail.gmail.com> <03142CEC-FE2D-4232-BFE4-AB5E02880AC1@ve7jtb.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 11:46:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+aD3u2FoddGpjhVaDWRidknNiOmSWLMxEXZw9jF04DK+5B6_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkKguvSj9N6u/c/Yai5S6inBV/fJ6lcFVy1W1CzsrQQWMEhaGCYG7S6sbut14UF0z4wVSMl
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 11:46:01 -0000

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:39 AM, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> wrote:
>> 1) say the parameter takes "any URI or user@host"
>
> Also move acct: to a different spec.

Yes, that is what i meant and also what i think would make sense.