Re: [apps-discuss] font/*

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Thu, 10 November 2011 11:09 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFC721F8AED for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 03:09:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.208, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fn2VjF2sy8oC for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 03:09:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72D921F8A91 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 03:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id pAAB9oND031072 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:09:50 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 591a_9091_825082ee_0b8c_11e1_bbef_001d096c5782; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:09:50 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:40905) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S156B7F8> for <apps-discuss@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:09:54 +0900
Message-ID: <4EBBB0EE.8050502@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:09:34 +0900
From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
References: <4EB86078.8070904@stpeter.im> <BDC0F178EEB88CC4B3D24020@PST.JCK.COM> <4EB8D0F4.9020907@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <24FBF40353ABCC3A4F15E82B@PST.JCK.COM> <4EBB2B83.3060901@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <01O88AB2EM7S00RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01O88AB2EM7S00RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] font/*
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:09:52 -0000

Hello Ned,

On 2011/11/10 13:06, Ned Freed wrote:

> The only place I know where there might be a problem with a new top-level
> font type is SDP. I confess to knowing next to nothing about SDP, but
> it uses media types and has some really screwy constraints on on what it
> can
> handle. I'm not seeing an application for font types in SDP, but if there
> is someone more familiar with it sohuld be consulted on possible issues.

Who would we contact to check about this?


> In practice the issue of what to register where has never been much of a
> problem. Speaking now as media types reviewer, I have not infrequently
> pushed
> back on top-level type choices, usually successfully and always amicably.

Do you know of any examples? This could help Dave with the general list 
of criteria that he wants to develop.

Regards,    Martin.