[apps-discuss] Malformed mail (was Re: Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-03)

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Thu, 27 June 2013 01:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D5711E8177 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PLU2TSTn+k0x for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF3611E815C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OVBCWVPUN4005T28@mauve.mrochek.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=iso-8859-1
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OVBCNODMOG007PSE@mauve.mrochek.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01OVBCWUMFA0007PSE@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 13 May 2013 15:39:32 +0000" <20130513153932.91355.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <CAL0qLwaBPhyPEKHPwRurqoCnNy2_tp6rCHe7YzvPonvfN_ALHQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130513153932.91355.qmail@joyce.lan>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] Malformed mail (was Re: Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-03)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 01:35:47 -0000

In regards to malformed message, I just ran into one containing, among other
things, the following fields:

Received: from 1.2.3.4 @ host user@host
Received: from 4.5.6. user@host
Return-Path: user@host "phrase"
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 9-bit
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME Ver: 1.40

(I have of course anonymized things.)

Of course I've seen plenty of broken messages, but this is taking things
to a whole new level.

				Ned