IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is correct

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 07 January 2015 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E311A009E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 08:58:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jdrbRUoqAmk6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 08:58:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 513851A0012 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 08:58:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.194] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lp7d2-1Xd9Xd0Vfg-00etUY; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:57:57 +0100
Message-ID: <54AD6592.1020101@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:57:54 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
References: <20140926010029.26660.82167.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <EAACE200D9B0224D94BF52CF2DD166A425A68A90@ex10mb6.qut.edu.au> <CACweHNBEYRFAuw9-vfeyd_wf703cvM3ykZoRMqAokRFYG_O7hQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM2PR0201MB09602B351692D424A49C6B0DC3650@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CACweHNBN_Bv=jeXQ_VwXi2HzHKNEwZJ1NiF-BJJo_9-mhO60gQ@mail.gmail.com> <54A5730C.8040501@ninebynine.org> <54A583DD.9010602@intertwingly.net> <54A59651.4060306@ninebynine.org> <54A59B26.5000408@intertwingly.net> <54A6AABF.4060406@ninebynine.org> <54A6B6DF.1010206@intertwingly.net> <54A7DC46.2020708@ninebynine.org> <54A7E9F4.80406@intertwingly.net> <54A820EA.20200@ninebynine.org> <54A82CC4.9080606@intertwingly.net>
In-Reply-To: <54A82CC4.9080606@intertwingly.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ep1qj2ixpQRE6gUsuDTGWyayOldB3/8zrGtzMSrAb+EPsooGMvn dA8skUF2ui+SIXxpUr/5TheO+HP3XB8GDjIckUIOWo1kVNk9wOKgol23O/YAfDh8urbQ9a5 EW3+iyqP77PChDzzqQocdcjLl5RGi7Vz036LP6fDUBXxJwTxBPD4urC0Ol6Hz59PJ9XCXH7 PpZZMMjKf8QDT9PYEPCDA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/8CxoRtxE8Pk8u7WDgnfr91zMlwE
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is correct
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:58:02 -0000

On 2015-01-03 18:54, Sam Ruby wrote:
> ...
> Meanwhile, I'm actively inquiring as to whether there are others who
> would be willing to help update RFC 3986 with me.  If that is not meant
> to be, so be it.
> ...

I am willing to help to update RFC 3986 once we actually know precisely 
what needs to be done.

Best regards, Julian

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status