[apps-discuss] The 'afs' URI scheme
Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Fri, 07 January 2011 06:23 UTC
Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC44B3A67A5 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 22:23:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.16
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.16 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.438, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lPVFbsAMTQRb for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 22:23:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EECD3A67B1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 22:23:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so16957524bwz.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:25:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type; bh=zalD1+kBFp07e71peBiALp7ZIWevrxdtRAGV5NSD2e8=; b=RAlng9Wi8ipr6fri7kDcJilBSGCHwhHMySBZOPou4r3r2CYmIes6FqKMqajGoD7wC+ 2YYK687OMYnKn5Lpu9X9FYCOjnWHi1sbudXkR3sF9a3wB+HF5gCwV26aePvCXCMiUxwG d0hw6UpAcWXvZKsuImEAA28ibi7POFjx1/voQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type; b=c2C+myN2Lomx5WCaV2c4OKKLAr5NarnoCCNBGzpzcxvluv/E+C9G8JjI+efnN0AKh8 BgYQWoqQdpMzhk1KanXAFzcbT+oFIlEKIgLpGCbSaicKfcbYAu15IQVWCcjqqhWWShRN 2S9DsmH3BdkhDD+0cGJxbeOGLGrJJYjFsqQYg=
Received: by 10.204.59.140 with SMTP id l12mr183506bkh.2.1294381509866; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:25:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f20sm11439404bkf.4.2011.01.06.22.25.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:25:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D26B1D6.9070906@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 08:25:26 +0200
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020201010502020007030801"
Subject: [apps-discuss] The 'afs' URI scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: URI <uri@w3.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 06:23:09 -0000
Hello all, There has been a discussion on moving the 'afs' URI scheme on URI@w3.org mailing list. I am writing to request the wider discussion of the issue. So what do you think about this? Please copy the answers to URI@w3.org ML if possible. Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- [apps-discuss] The 'afs' URI scheme Mykyta Yevstifeyev