IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Thu, 17 November 2011 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D4C21F97F0 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:52:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.309
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.309 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.290, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id buIZZN8bnzlS for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1408121F97EF for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:52:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:52:35 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: apps-discuss Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:52:34 -0800
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations
Thread-Index: Acyk8I/KgEDKto9fT3ChlROc1b5r5gAAMzzAAADq0KA=
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C150DD@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20111117045856.117E6B1E003@rfc-editor.org> <B2896927-475F-41A7-8D87-336B672A4D9B@vpnc.org> <4EC4A6E0.6000503@stpeter.im> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C150D8@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C150D8@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:52:41 -0000

> > Good work. Congratulations to all involved.
> 
> +1.  And that's perhaps the biggest "+1" I've ever dropped.

...and now, to explain why:

The author of RFC6449 has been battling illness for much of this year.  As his illness suddenly became quite grave, we asked for the support of MARF's Area Director and the RFC Editor team to help advance his document to publication hoping he would enjoy seeing it published.

The staff's effort to expedite publication was extraordinary.  There's quite a bit of work to the process and it normally would have taken another month or two.  The technical editor Stateside stayed up all night to complete her part of the process.

The publication announcement came about 20 minutes before his passing.  I forwarded it, and it was read into his room moments before he left us.

My heartfelt thanks, and those of his myriad friends and family back home, go to those who helped to make this happen.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email