Re: [apps-discuss] IETF technical plenary: the end of application protocols

Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> Fri, 25 March 2011 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <GK@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA76E28B56A for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.556, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17ASIak0ddFr for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay2.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay2.mail.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E7A3A6859 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.205]) by relay2.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from <GK@ninebynine.org>) id 1Q37Zl-0000Wh-6S; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:01:17 +0000
Received: from tinos.zoo.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.24.47]) by smtp0.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <GK@ninebynine.org>) id 1Q37Zk-0007WG-2o; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:01:16 +0000
Message-ID: <4D8C6A0F.2090908@ninebynine.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:10:23 +0000
From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
References: <4D87612E.3090900@dcrocker.net> <4D881C04.2080406@qualcomm.com> <4D885482.2050006@ninebynine.org> <6266.1300784475.434865@puncture> <3F2B4909-DE99-4189-98BC-5E9DDCE3CAC5@gmx.net> <4126.1300977355.111049@puncture> <AANLkTikQsY0k4qVP9RFyjkSoTYusZ4Pxny6fgfoL6X0O@mail.gmail.com> <4126.1300980977.007329@puncture>
In-Reply-To: <4126.1300980977.007329@puncture>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>, Dave CROCKER <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] IETF technical plenary: the end of application protocols
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:59:47 -0000

Dave Cridland wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread/thread/c82cd59c7a87216a?pli=1 

I assume you refer to:

"Twitter is a network, and its network effects are driven by users seeing and
contributing to the network’s conversations."

> Anyone present who doesn't choke at the "Twitter is a network" line 
> should really wonder what they're doing here.

There are many valid uses for the term "network":

- The Internet is a communication network
- The Web is a network of documents (and more...)
- Life is driven by biochemical signalling networks
- Biological ecosystems are resource distribution networks
- Railways are transport networks
- Communities of people form social networks
- etc.

And the great insight (surprise?) is that many of these networks share 
properties on common when viewed in a sufficiently abstract light.  Cf. [1], 
[2], etc.

And I people who are doing practical work that spans these fields; e.g. related 
to http://webscience.org/webscience.html to name just one example.

So within this, I think there is a valid position that Twitter is *a* network. 
Just not a network that forms a basis for almost all kinds of computer 
communication.

If we are to be relevant to a wider community of users, I don't think it helps 
to assert ownership of the term "network".  So while I personally disagree with 
Twitter's position stated in the message cited, it's not with their claim that 
"Twitter is a network".

Let's not confuse apple and oranges.

#g
--

[1] "Linked", Albert-Laszlo barabasi
[2] "At home in the Universe", Stuart Kaufman