[apps-discuss] draft-yevstifeyev-pop-wrong-state
Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Sun, 21 August 2011 17:25 UTC
Return-Path: <presnick@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950F921F852E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0HEoWAAuT0pr for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A95D21F852C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1313947615; x=1345483615; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<4E513FDB.7090000@qualcomm.com>|Date:=20Su n,=2021=20Aug=202011=2012:26:51=20-0500|From:=20Pete=20Re snick=20<presnick@qualcomm.com>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.9)=20Gecko/20100630=20Eudora/3.0.4 |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Apps=20Discuss=20<apps-discuss @ietf.org>|Subject:=20draft-yevstifeyev-pop-wrong-state |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"ISO-8859-1" =3B=20format=3Dflowed|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |X-Originating-IP:=20[172.30.39.5]; bh=7H86k5AdaOcFPURwxfiysPQQw0SnRtzJ2yo1sUYLo/s=; b=rwZd3YHlv0kKAlyoCTmKu2YqSuogJTR1ppsdo9JMjrp+QX2jrtYghdN8 7Kdfk5l6hmS1u+q4qkgTO3vOQTa6vj7gl1A/HLwN7UYTj/uzgZJx607qC 7OC3xTrSDddXWX3dNVdQSCh5bdFrs2eN+E3I+2glSlOQ2g3+HB2mPVLtO g=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6445"; a="111868107"
Received: from ironmsg03-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.17]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2011 10:26:54 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,258,1312182000"; d="scan'208";a="101055094"
Received: from nasanexhc08.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.7]) by Ironmsg03-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 21 Aug 2011 10:26:54 -0700
Received: from Macintosh-4.local (172.30.39.5) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:26:54 -0700
Message-ID: <4E513FDB.7090000@qualcomm.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:26:51 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.39.5]
Subject: [apps-discuss] draft-yevstifeyev-pop-wrong-state
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:25:53 -0000
Greetings all, [Non-WG item] The ISE received draft-yevstifeyev-pop-wrong-state to publish as an Experimental document in the Independent RFC submission stream and has asked me to check on its suitability. Two questions for the list: 1. Is there significant interest in implementing this POP response code extension? I ask because, if there is, it might be more appropriate to bring this into some Applications working group. 2. If there isn't widespread interest, does anyone see any harm in this being published as Experimental in the Independent stream? It seems to me a very simple extension with little significant impact. Thoughts welcome. pr -- Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
- [apps-discuss] draft-yevstifeyev-pop-wrong-state Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-yevstifeyev-pop-wrong-st… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-yevstifeyev-pop-wrong-st… Chris Newman