Re: [apps-discuss] FW: I-D Action: draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-00.txt

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Wed, 03 April 2013 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C65521F8C03 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kYgQ51doLCcG for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f50.google.com (mail-oa0-f50.google.com [209.85.219.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EE621F8B35 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n1so1468522oag.23 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=z5JCVkgLIZkUALZTOWNMfTCLuGy9ZhEQltpYmT22BIU=; b=ir1CaAMrFkail99oPbEr/t5QD8b14kCUIfc/DnIEr1mZ7q50rZOEp1uqVbLcPxmmn8 /Soi4RWVjSCk3fRbG6Athzp/9nNMjZ1ia9W2a+jTFyALj5yG4JLYBoc3Ss6ExGkf/5fJ ThS+7olKDNEfQBHLZMOrRb5Xel5oE55A/KjVM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=z5JCVkgLIZkUALZTOWNMfTCLuGy9ZhEQltpYmT22BIU=; b=DFHmnKvk+7zKP0ELsJxkKlE5HCW9Mn+7HYzLJGkvbvQcCyapvo7Eoz9idZbJTaKeu8 ruZDMUdKNihmZaLnwxuLWAWYk5ItRUUz5KXReP+s4ibuIp9DOn9RWr7ipTjggh53+vow w1PlqgXZCoUfVyEEXjeKQna6s4jlEzJdpN1/m5M8bcMpXHUcqqntlSNvs/Gkuo/hLdZo 9zxUYtzecAMMz3JVSEf37wMPn8xeLyRmAreBM78SFsraxqsIIlDpQvWFqEHynw177jyI xfQoG0ei6RJG4EEcp99WeJzt879rUwXj16sfMQhh5sGK+nBSaoZw53VWZ7rz/tuBzuUt zTZw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.17.132 with SMTP id o4mr1134412oed.12.1364995837348; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.22.105 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <515c144c.22e7420a.31eb.3b74SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
References: <515c144c.22e7420a.31eb.3b74SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:30:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzz-vbeZ4B5hFpYfR3RbDq4oYJs5pBS-E66gHxWnTe0VqA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01294d0c01625804d974dc74
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzWorpMa5fL0EPEWzFL6cQ1kx5+vQjgRD52yyO5uqsVFz9v72CKe/TEbTLjfdywWLSQs0o
Cc: Rest List <rest-discuss@yahoogroups.com>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] FW: I-D Action: draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:30:39 -0000

Seems reasonable, though I had to read it twice to appreciate that
non-URNish URIs may also be registered.

It might be reasonable to underline this point by having the example
registration (not the registration of the example, which is different,
though currently the same text) in §3 register an
http://example.com/profiles/example instead of the
urn:ietf:params:profile:example.

Obviously the §5.2 registration should stay the same.