IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] RFC 6839 structured suffix support in actual software

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 22 January 2016 07:47 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8A21AC42B for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:47:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p-Ao5tPbil_h for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A77B1AC42A for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.110.208]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LynHb-1a1hiJ1NNH-016A7s; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:47:20 +0100
To: "Rushforth, Peter (NRCan/RNCan)" <peter.rushforth@canada.ca>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <20160120204423.946A41ACE57@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <56A1DE89.9040501@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:47:21 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160120204423.946A41ACE57@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ECVs7Wx3ZcKHua6csUdOsyBGrCeow5gSkliQmguIlWrcWVQHQl1 o/G/Z9HQ93WQM061poZ0PJA6DXrkURGxnlr6t+w9SkxRpNK7bCWSFnk/oMemWXt6yfSbLtd HJJPScDdRvrYYnkLD5aFsVegDgyiu4IlWfdNZD6yXP0wUnFAkcW6y5bO+c7S8O+HpUmTXIo Ud90C325yQO0Q4se3Qk2Q==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Wc+hB79n3ww=:iNDRNoVcEn0ZiqQaEZr7KS U/cu6NZb65LcGEw1J/VgLsGg88lnyUbobprD6zqFlLzNmIBJbhErUSt5wJiyPqCVUXo3tlITv PLOl0MOF5pT0DfddkuSdUU2ukKyuT2Q4N4bq5vqdyCSGi5lNjY9xmFmqCoBDbHVmyCH0J04+o Vu5wGIgl5nds1WGuNiFLZcx+AVvdn1V5c0y2X+nWtTR336J9ew24pRRrTT0qCju4C1AIJj7E+ raZBYN6N65ZB1TmeoAZHA1vREXqUGwX2P7P3+AV63FPwxcKDciZcSocDhfbC+cSgGfglNXqAl JnqHViyg5FoU3e8c93sMFuGx9fgP8HXlnv80MdgrYi6uNmmh3VaOv5oUfWzRe38nxtdqC9BoV fcNReX10Jp376gL4d02wb7keSa628jlBNCHhMP5FJoumbEmk4Rwjd9W2OvyBkOfYFIImt/8c8 PspCu4IKTyEXLPcH1i2WzJD+r0cd8T1OBzicZzAb1XDRvY7g1Uq1isu/LEHgzOZ1M67P3HIZX AO/NRlrxWaXw4IQXwaSYh2fUKe5gzZrXdqqUAKj71Hv7hvGnIvBKRtBrougFXKV2vdgBI71mO BIUj6JCLaSrHSY8o8sOHAD9Y9z5ZILrTp6UTDaHZTxPApvDHMmsWYFJSW13ZtBr4wvYOXXQi+ OuzKk27iyAoq56SrP/68ginWq21rkbc9bpYktwexLNK0EwTRGRDbQGtnaPphpM2rl8EeK2ADL 6SD7LM5zPUjHYoAlf4ESnxiMGJ2frCv8z0weG1NQKiPBwIWif0ZYs6zIAmRn9XgvVHzcUbArm f0RdSYm
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/Am_pYEH9iUJ5oRh0U2ZrNVZpVf0>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] RFC 6839 structured suffix support in actual software
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:47:26 -0000

On 2016-01-20 21:44, Rushforth, Peter (NRCan/RNCan) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone please identify some available software which implements the behaviour described in section 2 of RFC 6839,  specifically, generic processing of a media type based on its structured suffix?
>
> Any structured suffix will do.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Peter Rushforth

AFAIK, XMLHttpRequest triggers special behavior based on the "+xml" 
suffix; see <https://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#response-entity-body-0>.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email