IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-04.txt

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Thu, 23 May 2013 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0C621F97E9 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ssEURBxGVHIf for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48B421F97FC for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4NFlq0T021913 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 May 2013 08:47:55 -0700
Message-ID: <519E3A24.3090502@bbiw.net>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:47:48 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <20130523154124.25978.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20130523154124.25978.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.67]); Thu, 23 May 2013 08:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org, vesely@tana.it
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 15:48:01 -0000

On 5/23/2013 8:41 AM, John Levine wrote:
>>> I believe the change from:
>>>
>>> authres-header = "Authentication-Results:" [CFWS] authserv-id
>>> 	[ CFWS version ]
>>
>> Note that in bis-04 it is:
>>
>> authres-header = "Authentication-Results:" [CFWS] authserv-id
>>         [ [CFWS] authres-version ]
>
> You're right. Adding the brackets is clearly a mistake since it makes
> it impossible to tell where the authserv-id ends and the
> authres-version starts.

huh?

d/



-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email