Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-04.txt

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Sat, 09 July 2011 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B010921F85DB for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 11:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hrToJRRjmjNB for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 11:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE68521F85DA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 11:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so3684170fxe.27 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zs3I02uGgRhkcO3xWm5Af4V6IwQlc22iz9MYfbRgJgY=; b=jUmD5n24xbHy0KcxOhQnXq9F/kNhtcwt7v9aj/QMFAKg6S7zgGqhRy8JCLjy7GeOgk aTQO5HsSL19beNg/7kyBuUAHXrloq57Xqf1jOpKb01/2p0MvDbFgjJcvOEX4kKfNxwvP FBiyWJjtvWKXb/EOY3IrPqjZ2ME8RBgA8I16g=
Received: by 10.223.76.16 with SMTP id a16mr4875615fak.47.1310234537967; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b13sm8153382fab.36.2011.07.09.11.02.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E1897D7.9030300@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:03:03 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
References: <4E15C895.6020701@gmail.com> <CAHhFybq563a9+ivYuk83J3po_02nopeiu=mB3fO26f-o1Mwt0A@mail.gmail.com> <4E17CC3C.8080308@gmail.com> <CAHhFybpMkD3UEfOQ-VmXZ+g1ArY9gG0qSC-ZgFBL39+G_O_4HA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHhFybpMkD3UEfOQ-VmXZ+g1ArY9gG0qSC-ZgFBL39+G_O_4HA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>, Apps-discuss list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-04.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:02:19 -0000

09.07.2011 13:58, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> On 9 July 2011 05:34, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>
> Skipping the i18n and security considerations until I see
> a new I-D one quick addition:
>
>>> an unencoded "#" starts the fragment and is interpreted
>>> (or ignored) by clients depending on the document.
> [...]
>> This will also be included in the draft.
> Thanks.  My comment almost missed the point, the fragment
> depends on the document<add>  type, it does not depend on
> the URI scheme</add>.  In the times of "hashbang URIs" it
> might be necessary to be as clear as possible about this:
>
> Fragments are one of the subtle differences between STD 66
> and its predecessors (incl. RFC 1738).
OK, this will be clarified.
>
> For my privacy concerns pick something that does not upset
> John or SM -- I'm almost sure that we want the same thing
> from different points of view (server admin vs. FTP user,
> with "popular" browsers hiding or not offering any choice).
I think I'll find corresponding approach to address these concerns in -05.

Thanks,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
>