Re: [apps-discuss] [domainrep] XML vs. JSON examples
Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Wed, 04 April 2012 23:06 UTC
Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D3E21F8533 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fVDaUL66ig7S for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AC10821F852B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Apr 2012 23:05:59 -0000
Received: from dslb-094-223-206-119.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO HIVE) [94.223.206.119] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 05 Apr 2012 01:05:59 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/SMbZ/4tLSdTX5hi65PTWKGJJTtLhE1cZuzeyH9r YSc9ObI05TturQ
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 01:06:06 +0200
Message-ID: <orkpn75ms2n5gb8en848unh8uls41er3i6@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280C8BC0@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F7C4851.4070405@att.com> <4F7C5471.8030309@bbiw.net> <4F7CCC06.7030503@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F7CCC06.7030503@att.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>, General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [domainrep] XML vs. JSON examples
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 23:06:02 -0000
* Tony Hansen wrote: >Although draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs both mentions the use of >+json and defines a registry that can be used to register it, and >despite +json being used already in a variety of registered media types, >+json hasn't been formally defined yet. > >So, I posted draft-hansen-media-type-suffix-regs-00 for consideration to >fill in this hole. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg04304.html -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
- Re: [apps-discuss] [domainrep] XML vs. JSON examp… Tony Hansen
- Re: [apps-discuss] [domainrep] XML vs. JSON examp… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [apps-discuss] [domainrep] XML vs. JSON examp… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] [domainrep] XML vs. JSON examp… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] [domainrep] XML vs. JSON examp… Tony Hansen