Re: [apps-discuss] W3C TAG Comment on Draft Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures

[Tony Hansen <[e-mail]>]

On 4/20/2012 6:30 AM, Jeni Tennison and others wrote:
 > ...

Thanks for all the comments.

This is what I've come up with that seems to satisfy the concerns I've 
heard expressed so far:

Media types using "+json" SHOULD process any fragment identifiers 
defined for "application/json" in the same way as defined for that media 
type. (At publication of this document, there is no fragment 
identification syntax defined for "application/json".) Specific media 
types using "+json" MAY identify additional fragment identifier 
considerations, MAY define processing for fragment identifiers that are 
classed as errors for "application/json" and MAY designate fragment 
identifiers defined for "application/json" that SHOULD NOT be used.

Same text for +fastinfoset, +wbxml and +zip. The note I added for +xml 
is similar:

Media types using "+xml" SHOULD process any fragment identifiers defined 
for "application/xml" in the same way as defined for that media type. 
(At publication of this document, the fragment identification syntax 
considerations for "application/xml" are defined in <xref 
target='RFC3023'/>.) Specific media types using "+xml" MAY identify 
additional fragment identifier considerations, MAY define processing for 
fragment identifiers that are classed as errors for "application/xml" 
and MAY designate fragment identifiers defined for "application/xml" 
that SHOULD NOT be used.



	Tony Hansen