Re: [apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document

Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@guppylake.com> Sat, 09 July 2011 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <nsb@guppylake.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BD921F8752 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 05:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YrNkn+5mOpYR for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 05:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.netnutz.com (server1.netnutz.com [72.233.90.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD2F21F8582 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 05:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=guppylake.com; h=Received:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer; b=Ctf7S/H//j4Zca/n6G2inKHfjro/cUM2IJaNPLTReQ5VyDShIHX6VVjf0gzrYfmxChDFYzfNEo9DAgjpwXRSd7W0LlyLoFjuN/MeQ0o64LKQGRz9JWqSoX4KfVWC03dQ;
Received: from host-39-196-68-109.spectrum1.uk.sharedband.net ([109.68.196.39] helo=[10.1.0.202]) by server1.netnutz.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <nsb@guppylake.com>) id 1QfWmu-0005bx-6u; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 08:37:36 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@guppylake.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDF199FC-C49A-431E-A42A-14A8A3841731@cybernothing.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:37:32 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6D5DBBA9-06AC-42BC-8C1B-DA7C538D8C11@guppylake.com>
References: <20110706052247.16131.qmail@joyce.lan> <A93D2D06-E4EF-447C-A3AD-1122A3D5A1EA@guppylake.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107081017070.14085@joyce.lan> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134EBC4BE2@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <DDF199FC-C49A-431E-A42A-14A8A3841731@cybernothing.org>
To: J.D. Falk <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.netnutz.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - guppylake.com
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:37:40 -0000

+1

On Jul 8, 2011, at 3:37 PM, J.D. Falk wrote:

> On Jul 8, 2011, at 7:27 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John R Levine
>>> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 7:24 AM
>>> To: Nathaniel Borenstein
>>> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document
>>> 
>>> Well, I did carefully say MSAs in that sentence.  You're right, picky
>>> enforcement of RFC 5322 and its predecessors on mail from strangers tends
>>> to lose more sloppy legit mail than unwanted mail.
>>> 
>>> I think it'd be worth noting that MSAs can and should be stricter about
>>> what they accept than relay MTAs are.
>> 
>> I'd be fine with that.
> 
> +1, so long as we explain that this is most often due to end user preferences rather than technical concerns.
> 
> --
> J.D. Falk
> the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss