[apps-discuss] For consideration as an appsawg document: draft-nottingham-http-portal
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 26 January 2011 02:29 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 7BA6E3A6917 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:29:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.818
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.818 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159,
BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x9jq6nyc0F+p for
<apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com
[209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEB03A68D5 for
<apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so481174iwn.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>;
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:32:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=K4CcICk0rVsMGtoJAL7H5PaJEj/f1HPf6E+uOGeZgD8=;
b=NxIhIzLISRBfmVXNuTZRsZ5wycE8mW63/t8joCXxmxDFxhKqz6tawxzQsz+TY54+Qb
h53lktUOMGOYcN6UGknvXstgV2cG4dnMbtRYrpmEgxUVJ41WEd+Ks2yFU0i23x2UGzSP
/vk5Hp3vLpcWNmLhvYVRnyGkYNduHijkexdmc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type;
b=BjJSo1accHSjNXZiJgBoiBzCq6jiZlrc4VUyrwA9Ap8QM8X6tGhK955/u2Qf6rsyLC
5xTkJW7ZGLXFRPHjHvRUHZhLGyxT7P6U+YUcNeJx44GwE+XPl4En7jv+22yr5Tcu8VFp
hm+dM+yr6GLpwcS23mviGBXPIr7OLYW64bqmU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.180.130 with SMTP id bu2mr7660025icb.18.1296009138332;
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:32:18 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.42.227.193 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:32:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:32:18 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: R2ebYqA26PClxXjr3qOEEFe3kp4
Message-ID: <AANLkTim=ML4Aytds_R97Mr=4=yxmRPHwRzF7H49TZwRK@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [apps-discuss] For consideration as an appsawg document:
draft-nottingham-http-portal
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols
<apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>,
<mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>,
<mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 02:29:21 -0000
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-portal This document has been discussed briefly on the httpbis mailing list, but it's not a product of that working group. The discussions were some time ago, and there wasn't a lot; see the following two threads: -00 version: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JulSep/0156.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JulSep/0157.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JulSep/0193.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JulSep/0196.html -01 version: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JulSep/0197.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010OctDec/0004.html The document has sat with no discussion since then, and the appsawg chairs and ADs recommend that the working group adopt, review, and discuss it. Please copy discussion to both lists -- this one, and also the httpbis list, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>. The appsawg chairs will be looking for objections to accepting this as a working group document; please make such objections by 4 Feb. In any case, please review the document and comment on it. This document needs broad review and consensus across the applications area. Barry, appsawg chair
- [apps-discuss] For consideration as an appsawg do… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] For consideration as an appsaw… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] For consideration as an appsaw… Barry Leiba