[apps-discuss] For consideration as an appsawg document: draft-nottingham-http-portal

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 26 January 2011 02:29 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA6E3A6917 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:29:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.818
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.818 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x9jq6nyc0F+p for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEB03A68D5 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so481174iwn.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:32:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=K4CcICk0rVsMGtoJAL7H5PaJEj/f1HPf6E+uOGeZgD8=; b=NxIhIzLISRBfmVXNuTZRsZ5wycE8mW63/t8joCXxmxDFxhKqz6tawxzQsz+TY54+Qb h53lktUOMGOYcN6UGknvXstgV2cG4dnMbtRYrpmEgxUVJ41WEd+Ks2yFU0i23x2UGzSP /vk5Hp3vLpcWNmLhvYVRnyGkYNduHijkexdmc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=BjJSo1accHSjNXZiJgBoiBzCq6jiZlrc4VUyrwA9Ap8QM8X6tGhK955/u2Qf6rsyLC 5xTkJW7ZGLXFRPHjHvRUHZhLGyxT7P6U+YUcNeJx44GwE+XPl4En7jv+22yr5Tcu8VFp hm+dM+yr6GLpwcS23mviGBXPIr7OLYW64bqmU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.180.130 with SMTP id bu2mr7660025icb.18.1296009138332; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:32:18 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.42.227.193 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:32:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:32:18 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: R2ebYqA26PClxXjr3qOEEFe3kp4
Message-ID: <AANLkTim=ML4Aytds_R97Mr=4=yxmRPHwRzF7H49TZwRK@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [apps-discuss] For consideration as an appsawg document: draft-nottingham-http-portal
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 02:29:21 -0000

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-portal

This document has been discussed briefly on the httpbis mailing list,
but it's not a product of that working group.  The discussions were
some time ago, and there wasn't a lot; see the following two threads:

-00 version:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JulSep/0156.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JulSep/0157.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JulSep/0193.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JulSep/0196.html

-01 version:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JulSep/0197.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010OctDec/0004.html

The document has sat with no discussion since then, and the appsawg
chairs and ADs recommend that the working group adopt, review, and
discuss it.  Please copy discussion to both lists -- this one, and
also the httpbis list, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>.

The appsawg chairs will be looking for objections to accepting this as
a working group document; please make such objections by 4 Feb.  In
any case, please review the document and comment on it.  This document
needs broad review and consensus across the applications area.

Barry, appsawg chair