Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer?

[Tim Bray <[e-mail]>]

What are the non-standard namespace practices in 4287?  -Tim

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:33 PM, "Martin J. Dürst"
<[e-mail]> wrote:
> On 2011/01/11 5:23, Tim Bray wrote:
>>
>> RFC4287 (Atom) specifies a small XML language and has been quite
>> well-received.
>
> Yes. But please note that some special requirements on namespace
> declarations are highly non-standard and not recemmended for imitation.
>
>> Also see RFC3479 AKA BCP 70.  -Tim
>
> That one is indeed very well worth reading.
>
> Regards,    Martin.
>
>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy<[e-mail]>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I’ve got a project on the go that will result in a few different I-Ds for
>>> consideration, one of which contains a specification for a new XML-based
>>> reporting format.  Can someone suggest some RFCs that have done a good
>>> job
>>> of the same sort of thing in the past that I could use as a template for
>>> such work, or a BCP or similar?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -MSK
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> apps-discuss mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> apps-discuss mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>>
>>
>
> --
> #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
> #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:[e-mail]
>