Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 31 January 2012 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EBE21F8512 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:11:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.345
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.345 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.346, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0-sJfS1-md2k for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:11:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A2E21F84FE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:11:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-231.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.231]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AEB440058; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:21:17 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4F282EBF.60800@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:11:11 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <002501ccdf64$8db56220$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4F2819DD.8060008@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F2819DD.8060008@dcrocker.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: apps-discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:11:16 -0000

Fine with me as well, added to my working copy.

On 1/31/12 9:42 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> wfm.
> 
> d/
> 
> On 1/30/2012 10:33 AM, t.petch wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dave CROCKER"<dhc@dcrocker.net>
>> To: "t.petch"<ietfc@btconnect.com>
>> Cc:<apps-discuss@ietf.org>
>> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 6:33 PM
>>> On 1/27/2012 8:08 AM, t.petch wrote:
>>> I do not see it in the I-D, about what, if anything, this I-D expects to
>> change
>>> with the parameters currently in use.
>>>
>>> If you think that's a problem, please explain why and offer some text
>>> to cover
>> it.
>>
>> Add at the end of the Introduction paragraph 2
>> 'This document makes no recommendation as to whether existing X-
>> parameters
>> should continue to be used or should be migrated to a format without
>> the X-."
>>
>> because otherwise this obvious question is left in midair.
>>
>> Tom Petch
>>>
>>> d/
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> Dave Crocker
>>> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>>> bbiw.net
>>>
>>>