[apps-discuss] Authentication-Results

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 22 March 2013 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAF521F8DCF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.343
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.343 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.256, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BIpM2lxNWm0D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111AA21F8928 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id t11so1345250wey.34 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=it1eMCd4L1I8WXeioeB1gHKQJG9MmGPtfLHdtkL2eCE=; b=Fpt0t4Q8LmlcmxvNvjP2vcMJRHD5D6Sd7Babo8JqoY3NzHJNb4I/5RlvMjdWsTIVOr A0PXpvEppZexK376GUXmAVVDeWdbbrAOHr21RSdHAUSubt047dvQGkRqqbeANGq7yDE9 meoKPi+lzQB/EAoOjBEs3U8yHta9o/yJ6rEMsdl5YQkjh+XiqS2JmpZCypCy/dX8i2cZ 6dpnIpVoJENodXxTufsjoGBCduGgz5Jd+/fgPvlewyfTwBrs/WrrsnBMYZVGALQAxvKQ 7Hb8oFdG/Ly32sNCAch6tw2VVSz463uHywkUb8mpxSu58owUXMVX0idWxdOui99DsCxl cLWA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id fs1mr4353314wic.5.1363970882120; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:48:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZbH4HnR8fHEmtLOtE9OFPAfhnN8Oqu6Hmqqed2OMjHJw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c26722e9b3b004d88637dd"
Subject: [apps-discuss] Authentication-Results
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:48:03 -0000



As you've seen already, I'm working on a revision to RFC5451.  Thanks to
Alessandro Vesely and Dave Cridland for their reviews and comments; I'll
have a revision out shortly that addresses these.

A Proposed Standard "bis" effort always benefits from describing extant
implementations.  I know about the ones I've written, and about some very
public uses of it (Gmail, Yahoo, for example).  If there's anyone in this
audience that knows of others, I'd love to hear about it.

Finally, are there any objections to processing this through APPSAWG?  I
can't shepherd it as I'm editing, so either Salvatore will, or we'll find a
volunteer to do so.