Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 09 December 2011 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7573821F87E2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:04:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.374
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.374 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.775, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tePf-7FTchme for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD8E21F8797 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-189.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.189]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 987FB42381; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:11:22 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4EE25B9E.2010206@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:03:58 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
References: <4EE2430E.4080501@isode.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20111209093855.0aa4fed0@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20111209093855.0aa4fed0@resistor.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:04:02 -0000

On 12/9/11 11:54 AM, SM wrote:
> At 09:19 09-12-2011, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> I would like to initiate WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt. Due
>> to holiday season the WGLC is going to be a long one and will end on
>> January 6th. Please send any comments
> 
> Please consider the comments below as nits.
> 
> In Section 1:
> 
>   "Therefore this document deprecates the "X-" convention for most
>    application protocols and makes specific recommendations about
>    how to proceed in a world without the distinction between
>    standard and non-standard parameters."
> 
> In Section 2, there is a "MUST NOT" for implementers of application
> protocols.  The "most" (see quoted text) is not taken into
> consideration.  The authors could get away with a "SHOULD" instead of a
> "MUST".

Good point. Thanks for the review!

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/