[apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-07

"Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Thu, 28 March 2013 06:35 UTC

Return-Path: <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E3321F919D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.695
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.695 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dSCyWVTjq57l for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (unknown [218.241.105.202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6ED0921F916B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: yaojk@cnnic.cn
Received: from unknown127.0.0.1 (HELO lenovo47e041cf) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:35:36 +0800
Message-ID: <BA4294295638436DA1EFEE619089B8A8@LENOVO47E041CF>
From: Jiankang YAO <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:35:35 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-07
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 06:35:47 -0000

I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer 
for this draft (for background on appsdir, please 
see 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate 
).  
Please resolve these comments along with any other comments 
you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document 
shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-07 
Title: Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets

Reviewer: Jiankang Yao
Review Date: March 28, 2013

Summary:

This draft is good work and almost ready for publication as informational RFC.

Major issue:none.

Minor issue:

  Abstract said:"  This document describes routing packets destined to IPv4-embedded
   IPv6 addresses across an IPv6 core using OSPFv3 with a separate
   routing table.", which means that this document will focus on routing packets.

  Section 1 "Introduction" said:"  This document describes a routing scenario where IPv4 packets are
   transported over an IPv6 network, based on [RFC6145] and [RFC6052],
   along with a separate OSPFv3 routing table for IPv4-embedded IPv6
   routes in the IPv6 network. ", which means that this document will focus on routing scenario.

  Section 1.1 said about "The Scenarion".

   The reader might have different understanding about focus of this document based on Section 1 "Introduction" and "Abstract" . The editor may need to do some improving writing to make the meaning more precise. 

Best Regards

Jiankang Yao