IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] .well-known as a one stop shopping location for Web Services identifiers

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 18 February 2013 01:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F8421F8658 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:07:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.427
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.427 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.828, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jHhs+gC5u+aA for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:07:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510B921F863F for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:07:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [118.209.197.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 042CE509B6; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:07:26 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwjGRpUpGB0WhDoxVnuB-ZxgTawHGwC6iPLDDdWiVxHkHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:07:23 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DB6135B4-4733-4F24-A1FC-CB3B3B54E15C@mnot.net>
References: <CAMm+Lwi3tozBJAYXYT0Lxvs4T67gn9vkiMbR24kD1r=-uY+UQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKHUCzzv+zHk6o2kaBGTR+u0qh-MmMMkZxGE8=0WbKShW2M24w@mail.gmail.com> <CECD8CC5-8E29-40E7-A51C-A5FD4383E14E@mnot.net> <CAMm+LwjGRpUpGB0WhDoxVnuB-ZxgTawHGwC6iPLDDdWiVxHkHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] .well-known as a one stop shopping location for Web Services identifiers
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:07:29 -0000

On 18/02/2013, at 11:32 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:

> Now the argument for the API: or WS: (Web Service) method is a lot harder, I agree. But given that it is prime real estate, doesn't it make best sense to share it equitably?

*If* your proposal for how to use it is, as I said, actually useful and attractive to web developers. 

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email