Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question

[SM <[e-mail]>]

Hi Bjoern,
At 17:37 27-06-2012, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>I believe for proposals in Standards Track documents, as is the case
>here, the process consists of asking for review on the uri-review list
>and addressing any feedback there. Anything else, like asking the ex-

Graham commented on that in a message at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg06377.html

>pert reviewer whether they approve or coordinating IANA registration,
>would be done by the IESG or otherwise happen automatically after the
>IESG is asked to consider the document for publication. A request for

IANA asks some administrative questions about the registration 
request.  The document shepherd responds.  Sometimes the author or 
the WG Chair takes up the task.  This is usually during the IESG 
Evaluation stage.

>review has been posted to the uri-review list, so if there is anything
>else Paul has to initiate, could you spell that out?

He has done what BCP 35 requests the registrant to do.  As there 
weren't any comments, there's no problem to be solved.  BTW, you know 
about URI reviews better than me. :-)

Regards,
-sm