Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Schema considered harmful

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 20 September 2012 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D95B21E8056 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.132
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.132 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BGuQFYl2oybN for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB6421E803A for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so2881795obb.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7qV1REzpTl5K8XgTzMUMQMRxgO0x3iTtOkDbZ4ZGcpM=; b=OwgF9PvPE4b73JUefzbggXZ7llBs1H4CF6ypllEoHvGKIiv3twvTwPpGJxpKOIVxM8 87YxzLKJhjiLol727j5+/JZBL4bEafmR36GHQ3sy3hF/eKUxf4zZ3dMfoiJZEb3expEd uFoUcc1YRgjXTk0AM3q4xXDrhI9FcQScPQSIh/HUEX/WbsS48TRYqc6VFF0CPDI4J7DC gV3XgjlWNvrJsL+m7A3qVML2O5BXja3670LxgVIIJfHCU5oc47JoOzPPd3JUi/6Ewkjn FtUuFVah482jB4AYGhbO6Y0TVDQfik226BCBuOZ9pwsfZ0dWAZszQN7vlawyUxPgRm/B T4Ww==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.172.236 with SMTP id bf12mr2243298oec.23.1348173328004; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.18.237 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <505B7B96.2010808@bbiw.net>
References: <CAMm+LwjYj0gd3Cxjj8WFcLy-zgBwfVDCPaRGcNSgOHD9m_07yw@mail.gmail.com> <999913AB42CC9341B05A99BBF358718D01DF0684@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net> <CAK3OfOgU-Kepre2Z2dg_S8DAVCU413SRvuWMvJcC3BmE0BjNbQ@mail.gmail.com> <505B43B3.7050503@berkeley.edu> <CAHBU6iupyZEhENRVYJ2sMNk79RSZbOVAawr6vP42uzNyO0z+Nw@mail.gmail.com> <77AFECFB-F63A-457F-9C7F-F715315C0651@mnot.net> <505B78B4.80309@dcrocker.net> <CAHBU6istjQ+vxtgBXE4aQ011tcOgudkxK9tq8e6enG8u+k_M-g@mail.gmail.com> <505B7B96.2010808@bbiw.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:35:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwgKXSLNgWY9JeFRY1X7Fpq7kSWYvfrL+2hwtzKz1k=-Sw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec54d47684fb4ff04ca281008"
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Schema considered harmful
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:35:29 -0000

My plan was to give people a tool that had the BCP encoded into its DNA...


On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> wrote:

>
> On 9/20/2012 1:20 PM, Tim Bray wrote:> Frankly that notion had never
> crossed my mind, but is there a case for a
>
> > “Tao of network protocols” or an “Informational BCP” or some such?  I
> > could put some cycles into it.  -T
>
>
> That's a book, not a BCP.
>
> I was suggesting a small-but-useful subset, which I thought was nicely
> exemplified by the terse list of practical direction of the precipitating
> note about choosing a notation language.
>
> Very narrow topic.  Very important.  Often very religious and very
> confused.
>
> Just the stuff of a BCP, IMO...
>
>
> d/
>
> --
>  Dave Crocker
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking
>  bbiw.net
> ______________________________**_________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/apps-discuss<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>
>



-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/