Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail BCP
Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Thu, 11 August 2011 13:13 UTC
Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7807321F8764 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.627
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.627 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.472, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w4KaZakygsoa for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055F621F85DE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so7574570pzk.18 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=RKeJ4ObiO8jwEGvcJK7gI9SMBD5S7q04UdJBGXKMB9M=; b=v8ON3fSRESfFWAJlKSGCl2voFxLA4Le2fn8g+kvJSYLL6ew1isuWafiQ/o3Yba0p0P QMtgrZGek0KH1fqHFesKqUF4ZLUo3ECcIZR4Uiy7j2Yl31GB61E8SCNwc60rlMgWayzP wKtUZ2iueWqVYoeKci401AZwZzKvlpGEY1oRo=
Received: by 10.142.166.5 with SMTP id o5mr959672wfe.390.1313068453174; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.143.157.2 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E43C639.6000206@viagenie.ca>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF694@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110810143624.0a2c2b78@resistor.net> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF6B2@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4E43C639.6000206@viagenie.ca>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:13:53 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHhFybp06t3x2oxg95wHz3bag94M_zAvszazatuF3yJAZNh9mg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail BCP
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:13:39 -0000
On 11 August 2011 14:08, Simon Perreault wrote: > IANA's job is to execute the IETF consensus. It still does not mean > that such a registry would be a good idea. Personally I would see > a wiki as more appropriate. An "expert review wiki" can be a very good idea, I'd love to test it for some topic (if it is MediaWiki, otherwise I'm not sure). And it could be hosted by IANA with an apparently "official" URI if they are still willing: MediaWiki administration requires some special skills, mainly the "willingness" to update the installation at least once per year, and to care about its i18n features with templates, extensions, and other technical details. For a "malformed mail" registry (or Wiki) "apparently official" and "simple to understand" are both important, when mail administrators are forced to prove their point in a discussion about legal issues. -Frank
- [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail BCP Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail B… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail B… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail B… Simon Perreault
- Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail B… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail B… Peter Koch
- Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail B… Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail B… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [apps-discuss] Status of the malformed mail B… Nathaniel Borenstein