Re: [apps-discuss] Apps-team review of draft-gellens-mime-bucket-bis-03

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi David,
At 11:36 18-04-2011, David Singer wrote:
>I agree, I think it best if capitalized verbs are used for 
>requirements expressed in the document. So I would not capitalize 
>'requires' in this case, but it's OK by me.

Randy commented on this in another message.  The "requires" should be 
clear enough.

>Existing text from 4281.  Can I have  MUST in a 'Note' 
>sentence?  Most bodies don't allow that.  I think that the 'Note 
>that,' should go:
>When the [RFC2231] form is used, the percent
>    sign, asterisk, and single quote characters have special meaning and
>    so MUST themselves be encoded.

I have seen "MUST" used in "Note" sentences in other RFCs.  You 
already had similar text in the RFC published in 2005.  As it hasn't 
been a problem, I don't see why it should be a problem now.

By the way, I gave an "almost ready for publication" rating as the 
document state is "Publication Requested" and the authors already 
know how to address editorial nits.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy