IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] a new web security list

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Fri, 18 February 2011 00:13 UTC

Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113453A6F76 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:13:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3FI8TF9MFAUZ for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:13:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gs19.inmotionhosting.com (gs19.inmotionhosting.com [205.134.249.249]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308863A6F72 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:13:11 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=standardstrack.com; h=Received:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer; b=YIt4RITpT6lPFI4kAUmk2BR4hJOGN2zXJ9TEFvEK3Nv+C95BwkOLqDw/s1crTUu/+5Wt5OtRlFMRSOcOTdhOGghOkD9LyDDBC8ac3XDi5J+fJYHeBWrpzE5fa5jFOrEZ;
Received: from ip68-100-199-8.dc.dc.cox.net ([68.100.199.8] helo=[192.168.15.134]) by gs19.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1PqDvu-000664-Qv; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:10:53 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-174--294245581"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D5DB048.10201@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:13:37 -0500
Message-Id: <961D5C2E-3159-4E84-B4DB-95E6F4373B3B@standardstrack.com>
References: <4D5D922A.8000508@stpeter.im> <4D5D9B46.40003@dcrocker.net> <4D5D9BB6.2070408@stpeter.im> <4D5DB048.10201@dcrocker.net>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gs19.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] a new web security list
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:13:12 -0000

You object to the object? <g>

On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:33 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> 
> 
> On 2/17/2011 2:05 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> I assume that accounts for the second word in the acronym:
>>> 
>>>> Web Objection Encryption and Signatures (WOES)
>> 
>> That's classic! I'll blame the Security Area ADs. ;-)
> 
> 
> I object.
> 
> d/
> 
> -- 
> 
>  Dave Crocker
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking
>  bbiw.net
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email