Re: [apps-discuss] [Json] JSON mailing list and BoF

["Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <[e-mail]>]

On 2/18/13 5:13 PM, "Francis Galiegue" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>I have really struggled to make this specification useful, and
>witnessing the users of my library alone, it looks like the pure
>validation part of JSON Schema already has quite a few users...
>
>I also make the best efforts not to repeat XSD's mistakes, and right
>now JSON Schema is young enough that it cannot have made such mistakes
>(I _think_). But in order not to repeat such mistakes, advice from
>external people is of course needed.

Oh! Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that I didn't like json-schema, just
that there are several different approaches that have been proposed, and
it makes sense to have a conversation about what our requirements are and
if we think we're meeting them with one of those proposals.

Charter-wise, setting the requirement to be "as simple as possible, but no
simpler" is probably something we can all agree on; agreeing on what
constitutes "simple" is likely to be more complex. :)

> Which is why reviews are always welcome!

I certainly need to review the latest versions before having an opinion.


-- 
Joe Hildebrand