Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful

"J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org> Fri, 10 June 2011 01:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AAD11E814C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id upFrEvotJqzy for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ocelope.disgruntled.net (ocelope.disgruntled.net [97.107.131.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC8F11E8145 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.102.0.106] (64.1.211.248.ptr.us.xo.net [64.1.211.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by ocelope.disgruntled.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p5A1nCYL028399 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:49:14 -0700
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 ocelope.disgruntled.net p5A1nCYL028399
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cybernothing.org; s=triac; t=1307670554; bh=BNnA87BqVaqWh0WSswhdh56KWxwM1i/NTkmOsJWsw sM=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=jNGWuT2MnhYH VL1twGcrOhmOvQhlLu8fQwW/u9unBb6C/KSvB9t5KdeAkjEvkTH2V2EmVp/xGdSVHnx 8V5KOf8M/104BTsK6pKx7LwSyvh3dbqDEKlXFg5FKfzUPnLK/MnbAaWCPG7m4nfYLdS FvvKnzPckT3RDEI8TLnDX7XWU=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
In-Reply-To: <C88E389F-57AD-4BEA-BCA5-94723BAF0380@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:49:12 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E7CF2722-55ED-43BC-AC2B-2405A429374F@cybernothing.org>
References: <321CAE57-EDC0-4DEE-801C-808FCBA36EF9@mnot.net> <4DE85364.6030900@stpeter.im> <C88E389F-57AD-4BEA-BCA5-94723BAF0380@mnot.net>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:49:16 -0000

On Jun 2, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Or just change the title to something more generic like "Appropriate use of X-".

+1

--
J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions