IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft

Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@guppylake.com> Fri, 15 April 2011 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <nsb@guppylake.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA03E065A for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 02:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f+BNkDKxWt1l for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 02:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.netnutz.com (server1.netnutz.com [72.233.90.3]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914FFE0693 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 02:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=guppylake.com; h=Received:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=B1juqvmmSk9HYUAbvl1+QJE7Z7Y1dOW71GfjCfabi9y/T/SVkGjsYJnGflsxXXFQsBz/UlaTipwdwQ3cZk1HzForvycUmpc+ErW2LJOBX5PSFlFDXAwrHif/U5CEi0wm;
Received: from [213.235.60.14] (helo=[192.168.55.155]) by server1.netnutz.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <nsb@guppylake.com>) id 1QAfBm-0006gj-QJ for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:19:44 -0400
From: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@guppylake.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-46-281949055"
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:19:39 +0100
In-Reply-To: <C9CC83DE.7031%styler@mimecast.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <C9CC83DE.7031%styler@mimecast.com>
Message-Id: <ABB28117-AAB5-462B-83B4-F48E01E3BF2B@guppylake.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.netnutz.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - guppylake.com
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:19:50 -0000

On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Simon Tyler wrote:

> https://www1.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00
.......
> If you have read this far then I think you will agree with me that Murray has made a good start on a much needed set of guidelines. Now let's see if we can support him to expand on the work he has done and reach a consensus on the best approaches.

+1

I have found that a lot of smart, well-intentioned people are repeatedly reinventing this wheel.  Completing and reaching consensus on this document would be a good way to ease their burden while increasing the overall consistency of the behavior of email as a complete system.  I encourage everyone who has worked on MTA's to have a look at this document.  -- Nathaniel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email