Re: [apps-discuss] "X-" revisited

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 11 July 2011 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC50D21F863D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.291
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.291 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.692, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o8eDU1ETNsWI for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A8B21F8637 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host9027e4f94482.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.88.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A110509D9; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:18:31 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAEoffTDZqt5wMGr+PkQ56Os8d+av7npJEmwe4viGfaNEMZ8TQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:18:28 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <463EE211-0C59-4865-98CB-F65A2549B273@mnot.net>
References: <4E08CDCB.70902@stpeter.im> <BANLkTikOQt4k8YDv5z43SYuRcq5rzueGKw@mail.gmail.com> <4E1518F2.6000403@stpeter.im> <CAEoffTDZqt5wMGr+PkQ56Os8d+av7npJEmwe4viGfaNEMZ8TQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@chromium.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] "X-" revisited
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 01:18:39 -0000

On 07/07/2011, at 1:30 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
>> 
>> Is there some kind of attack lurking here that we're not aware of?
>> Parameter phishing or somesuch?
>> 
> 
> No, that was not my concern. I am mostly trying to map your arguments
> onto the way we're currently evolving the HTML APIs, which follow a
> similar convention to X- (the vendor prefixes).


I think the difference there is that the number of implementations is relatively small.

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/