IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sun, 22 November 2015 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236F01ACD08 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:07:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.184
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37sYWC0A1Ssq for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:07:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (statler.isode.com [217.34.220.151]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A041ACD05 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:07:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1448212068; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=tMUqlduqpaQ2hUFUBQvHVc5YerKxoIriiTEKVh9Bn50=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=AB8FQaiOfStORTzt0yR3kH4mpKBH4Yl1mRgDQZoU/yZWXkdurBx8ovTrBEQ2cOONQdW5lb 2cV1ajN9o3/ltmND59rxG0ZdOuWhJbarsWlJsUodQWDqQkFL8gqh0LLaxJGmaGXDK5G2+Z q9Srm86NygrCHagUaqH/rJtwwH5yR88=;
Received: from [192.168.0.6] (cpc5-nmal20-2-0-cust24.19-2.cable.virginm.net [92.234.84.25]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <VlH2YwAlTg3y@statler.isode.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 17:07:47 +0000
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (13B143)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwb-p0zMpw3+YWRuFY+T5ZwOpWjDNpXehXXpS9WfwJkKqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 17:09:16 +0000
Message-Id: <9A50BBF2-E3F8-4C32-A3AE-674063C78A7A@isode.com>
References: <CAL0qLwb-p0zMpw3+YWRuFY+T5ZwOpWjDNpXehXXpS9WfwJkKqA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-3F52FF1F-5473-47E8-8504-D04CE9106E19"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/FX72yxhQZVUIQnl5-xHael70TK8>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 17:07:51 -0000

Hi,
Sorry for the late review.

> On 2 Nov 2015, at 03:50, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Colleagues,
> 
> This note starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme.  This document has been with us for a while and feedback has fallen to a trickle.  We've gotten all the feedback from W3C that we expect, so we'd like to move it toward publication.
> 
> Please provide review comments or expressions of support for the current version either on this list or privately to draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme.all@tools.ietf.org on or before November 20, 2015.  Be as detailed as possible.  The co-chairs need to determine if the document has working group consensus, which means we need to know people have read the latest version and agree with its content and with the idea that it is ready to proceed.  A simple “+1” doesn’t tell us anything.

I read and reviewed the document and I am pleased with its quality. I haven't tested various statements about what different implementations do. I support the document being published.

Alexey,
as an APPSAWG participant.
> 
> Also, if any participant has knowledge of IPR that needs to be declared on this work, please do so, as required by BCPs 78 and 79.
> 
> Dave Crocker is fulfilling the duties of document shepherd.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email