IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Schema considered harmful

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 19 September 2012 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64E321F8503 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.071
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.071 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AxU1DlgR4tRX for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a74.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F00021F8501 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a74.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a74.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF29D67C06E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=6cE1MvlYOLduAO8+TvMA q4OfiXg=; b=sHVuAg2OqctR4pC7Gyi9qG8uBAO3pcDA1ZIwnISvvOZa3Vf6QRvu /rEoMAgv+Mtti8xlEqpcSO75A7TabCVqN3KUle7/JFC+iI+xG1Xq8/P885GWVdf3 rbdaUdtqDH6FV3jBtJ5x80BeEDi5FbH7jw3ZeoDn0jXZ/OrkZsCLbi0=
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a74.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5A0867C06B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbbjt11 with SMTP id jt11so1163885pbb.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.226.195 with SMTP id ru3mr1361554pbc.149.1348092703353; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.20.194 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALcybBA0TqoO6Xdf02wM6=6HJeGokRVdxOQ2_SUmVBqxtNZOCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+LwjYj0gd3Cxjj8WFcLy-zgBwfVDCPaRGcNSgOHD9m_07yw@mail.gmail.com> <CALcybBCqAMLi8v61u1+oPpHaMpHrK4ufUm6fUUyMb8XMmz8JSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwiyohqhRA+m3M0ViSkt74q3yOfUkZj8b-upc4V_qUv22g@mail.gmail.com> <CALcybBCBScuO797yBmY3c_wRUa98=DYwN2rXXbq41pE2GHK4vw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgQLc8v+V7JhEr4zEw37e0ovrUkFy0RZKOszg1FbkMjeA@mail.gmail.com> <CALcybBDkOOfWq-qzR-6mtU8TULcp4BfS0h=WRKJZDSh+G8M9zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgNZuLYvyhayA2JQtH36e05HJWbdkKUt6yei10p5p-XRA@mail.gmail.com> <CALcybBAwYPGep4QMGK1Bx0SSmB=yTXRbjH9VGPZ0MKHcQzr_Mw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgJRAK6k_xp1Zky84owtWDD7m7ptZJpFsGwe80ikVmQBQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALcybBA0TqoO6Xdf02wM6=6HJeGokRVdxOQ2_SUmVBqxtNZOCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:11:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOgxaUvMOHDemXbThECsOvAgfkUhttiTwmuyNDe533Ywtg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Schema considered harmful
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:11:44 -0000

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com> wrote:
> And you'd have remembered, also, that I _explicitly said_ that they
> were not submitted yet because feedback was needed.

Well, we submit Internet-Drafts because feedback is needed :)  It's
quite OK to submit a badly incomplete/unfinished I-D; indeed, I'd say
that that's the only way to get started and make progress towards a
Standards-Track RFC.

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email