IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7303 (4578)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 21 January 2016 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63B61B30B6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 04:58:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6bAL9Ky8Ve1E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 04:58:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94D781B30BC for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 04:58:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 1so52982384ion.1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 04:58:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QO2d3hJS164DgnKyYbCGMd3PuaHuYurGWvAd/kHCBTM=; b=SyoFP7+ZBpZsaSsvmqv40ArTlRxrvuqEXOfuZWZZfA5FXZWBbCUs0mtMU7D3a1Ci/x Apz4YG1fUGWVoJCIRGGJmIvh+e6SRMhRYdjoyc78Whtgg5RKu4Nl+PMFhtsgh1+HX+Rc OVvHfYWhQLprHfKyPvXee/ZEoIIGzAFNriOd4L7IulS9dqO79no4i1cJQ2DUY85jgDp0 HzgicqbH/ZCQPuHYroyN0sprA3eigjgP3ks9H4erzl3QtuteXVoZO8hxbzVT4PpX1Db8 EBShxJ0hs8YGShdFOqqANJXDnWY9FY6fRFSwrbcGjZoIkTJbKyhOYimHqFYYu4tbn3Ek vjmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QO2d3hJS164DgnKyYbCGMd3PuaHuYurGWvAd/kHCBTM=; b=JrHSKuDcWfXwmoh1Yqbp3dBDu4MPgPtDglPx+IfCDoP9sBrjEn9M1AzP5dPofV/Zkq OwAyEfj5FWB4kuObuIBEgBrcCnSgBWKNfHI+AXdgpbEPT3SAtsFIz9+JSKBX4/U1gGyo pBJCXw4ul+hsHW2UAsL+RaTBPbp4f0CQR+sVmOj7/ZPSArk3NzYNxFLWdRVVLp88rc7K 3/PCLxviwxktJKshrXAkL+8OMyJthV3ESe64M8mzdgPhp98ysH/A+HVuBoPgw6K2sju7 ujzc+gQU0EudDzs3+kytBB0bwq5OM9BHS2Z1YFpQce8hN7CMdnCloPnu36yq/IxKF8GY 1O+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQmV7kRO2venafmfoL+FtQvl8tZMpnkbO78N7a+xep6XKUbEA9HxC1tlBFeFb+cHoR6f+bR9R0Gpqs3VQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.38.5 with SMTP id m5mr33042328iom.15.1453381109971; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 04:58:29 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.181.65 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 04:58:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <568D20ED.6010702@att.com>
References: <20160105014245.88C5A18000C@rfc-editor.org> <1707442344.20160105140217@w3.org> <f5bpoxe98on.fsf@troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk> <568D20ED.6010702@att.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:58:29 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: YIs5vnteAU9n7Oh6W-4zSU3NEHc
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVAmi0w8pVpgpEOQBo3-R=smExLoJ7Bzy02mFuVqjmCKuQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/FkS7JShdV3HvdGCymF9_JvzVuRs>
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7303 (4578)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:58:32 -0000

Seeing no further comments on this, I'm going to go ahead and mark
this report Verified.

Barry

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> wrote:
> On 1/6/16 7:47 AM, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> Chris Lilley writes:
>>
>>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7303,
>>>> "XML Media Types".
>>> I believe that the original text is correct, because W3C is change
>>> controller not only of the +xml suffic but also of application/xml and
>>> related types.
>>>
>>> Henry, do you agree?
>> No, I think Martin's change is OK -- this change is in section 4.2,
>> which is specifically a takeover of the '+xml' suffix registration from
>> RFC6839.
>>
>> That W3C is the change controller for application/xml etc. is not a
>> change, it was true in 3023.
>
> As one of the authors of RFC6839, I agree with the above comments, and
> support Martin's improved wording. W3C is not supposed to be the change
> controller for application/example+xml, and reading this sentence to
> mean that W3C does become such is definitely a mistake. Martin's
> improved wording eliminates any such confusion.
>
>     Tony Hansen
>
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email