Re: [apps-discuss] apps-team review of draft-ietf-sidr-ghostbusters-09

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Tue, 13 September 2011 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F68921F8A7D; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i4zHootbnLob; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [151.201.22.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BE211E808E; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B44019D2D51; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:03:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daboo.name
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daboo.name [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2pK1DDLEOIP5; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:03:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from caldav.corp.apple.com (unknown [17.45.162.46]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CBC719D2D43; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:03:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:03:24 -0400
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sidr-ghostbusters.all@tools.ietf.org
Message-ID: <BA1B475C8188F22B71411158@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJfu8T6QZ2fQfAwUL32hgOG9kPkioPO+tQZZLNGf12HNQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALaySJJfu8T6QZ2fQfAwUL32hgOG9kPkioPO+tQZZLNGf12HNQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; size="1030"
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] apps-team review of draft-ietf-sidr-ghostbusters-09
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:01:31 -0000

Hi,

--On September 13, 2011 1:17:53 PM -0400 Barry Leiba 
<barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> NEW
>    Per [RFC6350], the BEGIN, VERSION, FN, N, and END properties MUST be
>    included in a record.  To be useful, one or more of ADR, TEL, and
>    EMAIL MUST be included.  Other properties MUST NOT be included.

Actually vcard does not require the N property to be present, only VERSION 
and FN in addition to BEGIN/END (as per 
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6350#section-3.3>).

Note: vcard v3 used to require that N was present, but that requirement was 
dropped in vcard v4.

Also, would it not make sense to include IMPP 
(<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6350#section-6.4.3>) as one of the allowed 
properties? Seems like that matches the intent of using EMAIL and TEL.

The "Other types MUST NOT be included." is perhaps a little strong. I can 
certainly see situations where it might be useful to have other properties 
such as SOURCE, KIND or REV present. Perhaps that can be changed to a 
"SHOULD NOT"?

-- 
Cyrus Daboo