IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] App-ADs chatroom

Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> Fri, 13 May 2011 08:46 UTC

Return-Path: <GK@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DE4E073E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OdjypttA5Ls2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay5.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay5.mail.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F302E06C2 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.207]) by relay5.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from <GK@ninebynine.org>) id 1QKo0X-0000Uh-GC; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:46:01 +0100
Received: from tinos.zoo.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.24.47]) by smtp1.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <GK@ninebynine.org>) id 1QKo0W-00049Y-5T; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:46:00 +0100
Message-ID: <4DCCEFC8.5020509@ninebynine.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:46:00 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
References: <4DCB0146.9060307@stpeter.im> <4DCBA219.4070402@ninebynine.org> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134331A481@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134331A481@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635@OX.AC.UK
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] App-ADs chatroom
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 08:46:04 -0000

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Graham Klyne
>> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 2:02 AM
>> To: Peter Saint-Andre
>> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] App-ADs chatroom
>>
>> Do I need to be "authorized" to join in?  My client (MacOS/Adium) seems to think
>> so, but maybe I'm just doing it wrong.  So far I've only used XMPP for
>> person-to-person chat - is a chatroom significantly different to use?
> 
> Ditto for me just now with Pidgin.

Ah, could be a client issue, then, as I believe adium is derived from pidgin.

#g
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email