Re: [apps-discuss] HTML5 and RFC 2854
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 25 June 2011 11:21 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48F711E808A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 04:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.687
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.687 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.088, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LCaeGb4jssU7 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 04:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F14F711E8070 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 04:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2011 11:21:03 -0000
Received: from p508FBF56.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [80.143.191.86] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 25 Jun 2011 13:21:03 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18ff3xFSvAfjyBuM3I+WoScQtTPr74QKIacFoWJUo uy7DdbBVwOuo+2
Message-ID: <4E05C490.8090702@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 13:20:48 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
References: <4E04C38A.6090505@gmail.com> <4E05AFF0.9080705@gmx.de> <4E05C3A1.9080002@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E05C3A1.9080002@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: ietf-types@ietf.org, Apps-discuss list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, public-html-comments-request@w3.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] HTML5 and RFC 2854
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:21:07 -0000
On 2011-06-25 13:16, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > Currently copying this to ietf-types@ietf.org . I personally think HTML5 > should be backwards-compatible with previous version as well as the > media type defined for that version. So, first what should be done is > ... But it isn't. It forbids certain things that were allowed before and which are in use. I believe that in this case, a single level of indirection, like the one we have in RFC 2854, is the right thing. Best regards, Julian
- [apps-discuss] HTML5 and RFC 2854 Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [apps-discuss] HTML5 and RFC 2854 Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] HTML5 and RFC 2854 Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [apps-discuss] HTML5 and RFC 2854 Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] HTML5 and RFC 2854 Pete Resnick