Re: [apps-discuss] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-01.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 21 May 2013 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF7411E80B8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.485
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wGWIpIeX+OPU for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354E711E80A6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u57so693395wes.40 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cNp2n6Mcel5JVxQ++qmMB8jJvdmZpBAuLNlI497kpMI=; b=qiFzyw9RtcYfP3yQEz7xcz9S2ExE/p7UDF8rHbHcJ+XBwqYMBRwuj6q8NM8nSeMbSM PeHgOkpiJiKf09x7dDUpwyTtOqwAiPqeOkBnoUu1sDuuo+JObvQgpXFFYVF8zSZHv6BY 1IgnCnpa/v8TSz4uYwSWwRROZLpiE1ElhmW2uYlk2oTrsayOLqOnpwVmMmZIn669ar3h jdT084cyAJ7ZTFff1BWCHrD4iAjxz4YhamGzHzzGm5r2VkvoSS6mrU3VZ50ETzfR2zDr RW8ucnG9gGTN74juUhoFJ84qn/whTPJa0hBLl/Gc3V4vTc9JyOoTujDspwqS0ZVHzkPx TghA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.37.133 with SMTP id y5mr9020627wij.20.1369177079363; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.14.34 with HTTP; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5182b488.c4d60e0a.1ff8.0d8cSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
References: <516e8a54.45f7440a.7dcc.1253SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <CAL0qLwb+9CYnOYw9kcMdzZvyPagcUrhxUkmOiMZNAXpzFe6MYA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVC+rr0ZwBRk0jit7Ye-7H6D8yawiW7OG2RFhns5jqbQyQ@mail.gmail.com> <516f06c9.c1c20e0a.46f3.ffffb0bfSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <CAL0qLwY5LHuVdk__ySDDxBjsyfV0c5yTxZSRKj+Me5b+-2TsqA@mail.gmail.com> <51782a0a.21f2440a.747e.5f13SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <CAKHUCzyEy33RMt-cmRPwy00xyE4qP1GYMmMv475XQQnKFu+CaQ@mail.gmail.com> <5182b488.c4d60e0a.1ff8.0d8cSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:57:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaNBZECNY5gjXjTfmkQ1QB6bptCM8XFK7vV-KfAL9G70w@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f50335a733ea404dd4261c9
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:58:01 -0000

Hi Markus, sorry for the delayed reply.

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Markus Lanthaler
<markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>wrote;wrote:

> Thanks for your your support Dave.
>
> Barry, Murray: How do we proceed? Is there anything I can/should do at this
> point?
>
>
There hasn't been much expression of interest in supporting this document
in terms of reviews.  Only one person other than you committed to doing so,
though a couple of people did say they felt this was procedurally the right
place to do the work.

I'll pose the question again: Does the WG feel that this is something we
should process here?  Are there people (other than Dave Cridland) willing
to commit time to doing reviews and commenting?

-MSK, co-chair