Re: [apps-discuss] Draft for trace fields registry

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Wed, 18 January 2012 02:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1164021F854D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:21:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5E6MAt02Y5Pr for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:21:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AED721F8493 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:21:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OAWJARJME800UWXO@mauve.mrochek.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:21:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OAVYW3FP280137RD@mauve.mrochek.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:21:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <01OAWJAQ2AOA0137RD@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:20:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:10:50 +0000" <20120118021050.33898.qmail@joyce.lan>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
References: <4F15A667.4030708@dcrocker.net> <20120118021050.33898.qmail@joyce.lan>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Draft for trace fields registry
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:21:33 -0000

> I wrote a draft to add a trace column to the existing header field
> registry.  This is mostly about the registry; SM's draft (which I
> didn't know he was writing) is more about what trace fields are.

Would it make sense to you and SM to combine them?

				Ned